RainCloudz973 t1_jduef2y wrote
“Clear the homeless out of there” is such a weird sentence to me. These are people, not a rat infestation.
Jimmy_kong253 t1_jdug631 wrote
Honestly in the case of newark penn they are really are you get hounded by them from the moment you enter till the time you get on the train. That's why when they announced the renovations at Newark Penn as far as the benches and AC goes most peoples reaction was on the homeless there will appreciate it
Satanic_Doge t1_jdun7b1 wrote
Wow. You're a fucking monster.
Jimmy_kong253 t1_jduno8y wrote
How am I monster there are services to help people and as long as activists keep pushing the they have to get help when they feel like it and until then they can sleep anywhere they want narrative it's never going to get better. In fact some of the hardest defenders of homeless people I feel like have never truly dealt with them on a daily basis. Do you want to walk around and have your kids see some of the things I've seen around penn over the years? I don't think you would appreciate a homeless masturbating in the middle of the street, Someone screaming at you because you didn't buy them what they wanted in McDonald's or my all time favorite someone taking a shit in 1 track stairwell then throwing it at people. I'm a believer in bringing back the asylums because some people can't be left alone to function in society. If you don't like my position then be the force for change take em home with you when the government fails it's the citizens that have to pick up the slack
felsonj t1_jdusr81 wrote
The people attacking the OP and calling you a monster for asking whether a train station can be maintained as a train station are indirectly answering the question.
RainCloudz973 t1_jduu6wc wrote
It’s the language of referring to humans as though they were rats that people take an issue with, not the notion of maintaining a train station. Ideally Newark would provide some form of shelter or housing for them. But if that’s not the case, it seems a bit cold to just wish they’d be “cleared out” with no follow-up plan.
Jimmy_kong253 t1_jduvr9r wrote
But what happens if there are services and help available and every time they come around all these homeless people keep telling them no but because we can't force somebody to seek help. Some of these homeless people will tell you they want help yet they turn down help for years . What do you become that if what you're asking for your offered and you keep saying no and I'm not talking about just shelter I'm talking about their offered medical help counseling and shelter and I've seen them turn it down over and over in my 20 years of working in and around Newark Penn. I don't know what else to consider an individual at that point a squatter we can use squatter it's not the proper word but if it makes you feel better then we'll call them squatters
Newarkguy1836 t1_jduzmqg wrote
The liberal & media narrative goes like this:
"These are people down on their luck"
This isn't the great depression . Over 90% of these individuals are mental ill cases incapable of following rules. They overwhelmingly refuse to stay in shelters bc they can't shoot drugs or drink there. Neither can they bring their shopping carts & other stuff they hoarde. Nothing is more upsetting than returning to "your spot" to find everything has been cleared of another homeless person went thru "your stuff" while you were in shelter.
Insane asylums were closed based on the theory we could trust the mentally I'll to stick to the medicine regimen. Most don't.
A_TalkingWalnut t1_jdxkpnj wrote
Doesn’t having all the answers get exhausting?
RainCloudz973 t1_jduwdtc wrote
That’s another issue to tackle as a city then. But language contains intention, so people will critique inappropriate uses of it in order to curtail the potential for bad intentions seeping into one’s actions. For example, I have less trust in someone’s intentions who refers to queer people as “f*gs” when discussing how to help the queer community, than someone who speaks of them respectfully. It’s not a perfect science of course, but a safe general rule of thumb to keep people on a positive agenda when it comes to fixing societal problems.
felsonj t1_jdw7oez wrote
My sense is that there is room at the shelters, but that shelters have strict rules that many people would have difficulty following. Shelters of course impose structure that many would resist. I can understand the mentality of a person who is dealing with severe mental health and drug issues gravitating toward living at a place like Penn Station to the extent that it is made available to him. Then if there is a contingent of people essentially living in the station without realistic alternatives, how should the police handle that? Very difficult question, but I wouldn't fault someone for arguing that there should be rules against squatting / domiciling in the station, and that the police should enforce those rules. That is a legitimate argument, though not the only one.
The police are already clearing the station to some extent. If they weren't, one would see more homeless people at Penn Station, eventually to the point that the core function of the station would be in jeopardy. I think what we're seeing right now is some unhappy equilibrium / compromise between the interests of train passengers and station residents, as it were.
Educational_Paint987 t1_jduxqt8 wrote
Its a money/politics problem. They cant control movement between nyc/newark.
Which local authority you reckon should foot the bill?
Jimmy_kong253 t1_jduyqca wrote
Both States work together on a variety of issues just throw this on the pile. Plus whatever happened to that lawsuit Newark had with New York City about it that disappeared real quick
Educational_Paint987 t1_jduz161 wrote
Lmao Democrats politics is shady af. Knowing the NYC mayor position on homelessness from his recent actions, I doubt it will be easy to reach an agreement on the fate of these people. One can argue that homeless are running away from nyc to newark.
Jimmy_kong253 t1_jduzesb wrote
I really would love for an investigation into all these so called non-profits that are earning millions in contracts from both cities and states to deal with the homeless.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments