Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

effort268 t1_ivhutfn wrote

I thought they were adding an extra 3 floors

9

thebruns t1_ivhwgwn wrote

None of the old stuff is back there that can be saved?

6

GhostOfRobertTreat t1_ivi27ui wrote

I think the tall portion on the left is mostly original judging by the historic pic in that Jersey Digs article. Given that the buildings were converted into one, I would guess most of the rest was pretty beat up and not worth saving. We’ll see at the historic commission.

6

g11235p t1_ivioxct wrote

No, it does not help anything. This is one of three buildings from the same developer within basically a 1-block radius. None of them are providing parking, none of them are paying any taxes, and none of them will provide any benefit to the neighborhood

2

DrixxYBoat t1_iviwl9s wrote

I feel like in a perfect world, a kid as dedicated as you ought to have more of a voice in the city.

Kids in our school system need to be up to date on all the developments happening in the city.

High Schools ought to have developers clubs 🤔

Of course, our schools would have to actually give a fuck first. Can't expect kids to want to stay after school when you can't even provide a decent meal for em.

9

DrixxYBoat t1_iviwwl7 wrote

More development is ALWAYS good.

Could it be better, yes.

Should it be better, yes.

Is this barebones and honestly not very exciting in the grand scheme of things? Yes.

It's still needed though. Downtown dies when development ceases.

>none of them are paying any taxes

This part bothers me though. Too many developers receive tax abatements.

7

recnilcram t1_ivjtzvv wrote

F*ck, and I cannot stress this enough, them cars. They are within 3 blocks of 3 train lines, the PATH, the light rail, and literally dozens of bus lines. Would you rather they bulldoze it and put up a parking lot?

Property tax exists. Are they getting a PILOT? That's still money to the City. A parking lot or vacant lot provides much less money to the city. That ground floor retail will generate sales tax.

At a bare minimum, tenants buy food and drink nearby and support local business. Best case, they work local, buy local, and become part of the community.

8

DrixxYBoat t1_ivkijy1 wrote

Craziest thing is that we've had the same business administrator for around 20 years now, Valerie Wilson...

But it gets crazier, back in the 00s MTV recorded a documentary following high school kids.

One of the kids was from Newark Science, and had a HUGE issue with the lunch being served. Valerie came in as the school business administrator and made a big show to say she'd figure it out.

~20 years later in 2018, I met with her as a kid from the same school, and had the same exact complaints, (unknowing of her past record) she gave me the same spill as the other kid and promised that I'd see changes in the lunch programme.

I'm not the first to shit on administrators, but c'mon. School catering contracts don't last 20 years

5

Kalebxtentacion OP t1_ivklj52 wrote

Bringing in more units for people to live in so businesses can have more foot traffic other than office workers and college students who aren’t scared to walk the city streets isn’t benefiting the neighborhood

3

TrafficSNAFU t1_ivkypuc wrote

Not mind blowing but I like it. Understated but a good step up from what it is currently.

3

ayeelmao_ t1_ivlzsfa wrote

While I greatly appreciate the renewed investment in Newark, I wish there was a focus on using the older forms of architecture present in the city. Maybe the planning board does a good enough job of this and I’m just oblivious, but Newark (and Essex County in general) just feels more authentic with the older wall-wall stuff.

4