Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Newarkguy1836 t1_j3ubatk wrote

Ah, but did you know Newark has always been independent of New York City? Newark was America's second most industrial city after Detroit. Believe it or not, Newark and Detroit had the same number of factories despite only 24 square miles versus Detroit's 142 sq. miles. With the exception of the Frelinghuysen Avenue corridor and the Oak Island District of Ironbound, Newark factories were mixed within neighborhoods. New York was an industrial Powerhouse while New York City served as the financial Powerhouse of the region. In fact Newark was often referred to as the American and New York City Warehouse of industrial Arts. The 1940 " American Journal of industry and finance" I read as a senior high school student at Arts High School in 1992 evaluated the city of Newark and proudly proclaimed "Newark is independent of New York City" celebrate the city's achievements and predicted population of 1 million. However, the article compared Newark to Los Angeles in that opposite the Los Angeles case of 100 suburbs searching for a city, Newark was a 24 square mile super dense core looking for a city. The article went on to say Newark needed to Annex 16 surrounding municipalities or watch her glorious future be aborted.

13

Kalebxtentacion t1_j3upxk0 wrote

Wym annex 16 other towns

2

Newarkguy1836 t1_j3v217p wrote

"Wym"

Are you asking what do I mean by "annex"? To annex is to execute the process of annexation. Annexation is when an independent or non Incorporated area is brought into the fold of another Incorporated community.

You can look up the word for a much clearer definition.

3

Kalebxtentacion t1_j3v2jw2 wrote

Yes

2

DrixxYBoat t1_j3y8uck wrote

Annex as in Hillside, Elizabeth, Irvington, etc. should all be boroughs within Newark similar to how Brooklyn is a borough within NYC.

Cities like Chicago and Cleveland have similar landmass as if Newark stretched from here to Piscataway.

That's also why Chicago can have so much gun violence on one side, but be completely elitist on the other.

Imagine if Irvington was the gun violence capital of the world, but you live all the way out in Piscataway, so you don't really see it.

The only difference is that in Chicago, both of these places are still named Chicago.

Anyways yeah, Newark ought to annex other cities. The only "losers" would be the city council candidates who would find themselves out of a job.

6

lilsmurf8019 t1_j49onyj wrote

Politicians losing there jobs is the main reason it will never happen.

3

RationalMellow t1_j4a5sea wrote

What happened in New Jersey’s history is much different from that. There was annexation but a lot towns did break away from much larger ones and formed their own “townships,” boroughs, and villages. I’d also say they don’t take mass transit to Newark because there’s simply nothing else (besides the arena at this point) that would bring people in to the city for the purpose of mass transit use.

3