Submitted by steroidamoeba t3_11dhs0e in OldSchoolCool
Choppergold t1_jaab4g3 wrote
Suzanne Sommers wanted to be paid the same as a guy and they fired her
Lazlo_Hollyfeld69 t1_jaafie7 wrote
Ritter was and continued to be the real talent. Sommers decided to play hard ball and got her bluff called.
Choppergold t1_jaairnv wrote
She was a major draw
Lazlo_Hollyfeld69 t1_jaajxtg wrote
Not more than John Ritter.
ElectricPeterTork t1_jab5lxt wrote
Well, as they proved, you remove Suzanne Sommers, the show goes on just about as popular as it was for another 3 or 4 years.
If they'd removed John Ritter? Probably wouldn't have been 4 more years if they'd done that.
So, while it's almost certain she deserved more money because she was a draw, she probably wasn't quite worth irreplaceable star of the show money.
MalteseGyrfalcon t1_jabskvk wrote
Valerie and Roseanne proved that nobody is irreplaceable on television. I think about this at work sometimes.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments