Submitted by theREALPLM t3_10qtr0l in Pennsylvania
Atrocious_1 t1_j6swb58 wrote
Reply to comment by PregnantSuperman in PPL electric “accidentally” took a 3 month advance on automatic payments today by theREALPLM
I mean, ok, sure, I guess you can take things at face value and ignore the incestuous nature between regulatory bodies and the organizations they oversee
PregnantSuperman t1_j6syubj wrote
You want to give any examples of what you mean in the case of the PUC? I'm not coming at you, I just think it's lazy and cynical to automatically dismiss something unless you have evidence to back it up. Admittedly I don't know much about the PUC so if there really is an example of a conflict of interest in action I'd be interested in knowing.
Atrocious_1 t1_j6t3lyq wrote
Specific examples of PPL and the PUC, no. However there's been multiple historic examples, plus the fact that when the rate increases were first proposed thousands of citizens, businesses, and legislators wrote in saying this would be detrimental and the PUC basically told all of us "too bad lol"
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments