Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

madmanz123 t1_j8en2c4 wrote

Not sure why you are being downvoted, you are directly quoting the webpage, not endorsing the rule.

14

dogmomdrinkstea t1_j8eoaaa wrote

Bc of their comment stating "it is our hope". Implies they're involved. They also haven't said boo about being against it.

0

madmanz123 t1_j8esv5q wrote

Right, but if you click the link, you see it's a direct quote.

6

dogmomdrinkstea t1_j8et1ty wrote

Again, they didn't say they were against it.

−1

madmanz123 t1_j8eymyd wrote

Again, they also didn't say they were for it. It's a direct quote. I'm not sure I can simplify it for ya more.

7

dogmomdrinkstea t1_j8ezoy7 wrote

Do you think it's wise to post controversial shit and not decry it while using inclusive language? We can pretend it means nothing.

−4

madmanz123 t1_j8f1a9g wrote

No, I think people only put a certain level of effort to post things and dumb people don't follow links before downvoting because their too in a hurry to be outraged. It's a shitty policy, but I'm not going to assume the person who bothered to look up the details and repost them for our use is a shitty person by default because they didn't check enough boxes for you. Settle down and go be mad at the right people.

5

dogmomdrinkstea t1_j8f1lpb wrote

🙄✌🏻 you have a good one, this isn't worth my energy

0

madmanz123 t1_j8f43cu wrote

See, the thing is you should have figured that out before your first comment ;) Take it easy and drink some tea.

7

dogmomdrinkstea t1_j8f49vh wrote

Or, hear me out, I'm not gonna argue with someone who somehow thinks I'm responsible for multiple people downvoting and insulting my intelligence. Take it easy and quit being a "mad man".

0

mynameisalso OP t1_j8fcyug wrote

Why would I word the title like that if I was in favor of it?

5