SamuelLCompassion t1_j9r1pdl wrote
Cue outraged conservatives who can't believe Shapiro would waste taxpayer funds on water testing after Norfolk Southern already told us it's fine.
susinpgh OP t1_j9r35dj wrote
I'm glad PA is taking this step. I heard an interesting discussion on NPR today. It's not up on the site yet, I'll look for it tomorrow. I really don't want to misquote what the expert said about some of the chemicals.
GSDBUZZ t1_j9rbp83 wrote
I would really like to hear that. Do you remember what NPR program the interview was on? I could look it up.
susinpgh OP t1_j9rcrq8 wrote
I wish I did. The interviewer was a woman, and she had two guests, both men. I checked the site, and there was an article listed, but the interviewer was a man. This was today, and I am not sure how long it takes WESA to archive their shows.
EDIT: u/GSDBUZZ u/xxdropdeadlexi I tried looking the NPR schedule over for yesterday. I tend to listen while I'm working and don't really track the shows. I did two webinars yesterday. So, my listening time was 10AM - 1PM and 3PM - 5PM. I am so sorry I couldn't find the show!
GSDBUZZ t1_j9rd5fn wrote
Do you remember what time it was? I could look up the WESA schedule to find the program.
xxdropdeadlexi t1_j9t67sv wrote
I'd really like to listen, too! it would be nice to listen to experts who know about clean up instead of just people who work for the railroad.
aust_b t1_j9rrnxh wrote
The arguments will contain the following:
“Didn’t happen in my state! Not my tax dollars! Lock him up!”
Ground water and tributaries/streams obviously stop at invisible borders.
Blexcr0id t1_j9t05zm wrote
Thankfully, the definition included in the PA Clean Streams Law includes groundwater and all tributaries/streams. There have been rumblings for decades regarding paring down the definition to match "waters of the United States", which limits what waters are covered under the regs. I'll give you one guess which political party wants to amend the law. It's also very interesting that a certain political party wants to limit what is and is not pollution in our state. In their proposed bill, the polluter gets to decide whether they are polluting...
[deleted] t1_j9rtbnz wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j9u8q78 wrote
[deleted]
[deleted] t1_j9ulat5 wrote
[deleted]
PennSaddle t1_j9sm4ly wrote
Are you so stuck in the party mindset that you genuinely think a republican person doesn’t give a shit about a potential water quality issues!? Geez.
SamuelLCompassion t1_j9t3v8r wrote
Go ahead and clutch those pearls, but here is an example from yesterday in this very subreddit:
Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro says his office made a criminal referral in East Palestine train derailment
> Ok. But can he worry about our state?
[link]
Also, Meet the Four Republican Lawmakers Who Want to Abolish the EPA.
SpicyWokHei t1_j9tdgsm wrote
This type of thinking has always been brain dead. "You're worried about the tsunami in Japan while we just had the biggest oil spill here in the South?"
Yes, as an adult, we can think about more than 1 thing at a time.
PennSaddle t1_j9tjmix wrote
I mean, that’s one comment. Moreover, we shouldn’t forget the lack of oversight & pressure upon NFS to manage its lines here in PA to a higher degree. There is obvious negligence, which is what I’m hoping this person is referring. We need to avoid this happening again, here in PA. I don’t oppose testing like this.. in fact I love it, but a lot of what Shapiro (and many politicians) have done here is basically put on a show to prove how it wasn’t their fault. Regardless of any of that, this “team” mindset I see just constantly is gross. It’s like each of your “groups” views the other as some lower form of being. Get over yourselves.
SamuelLCompassion t1_j9toc8d wrote
> but a lot of what Shapiro (and many politicians) have done here is basically put on a show to prove how it wasn’t their fault.
Thank you for proving my point. This is an absolute clown take. The only person you're fooling with your fake nonpartisan act is yourself.
PennSaddle t1_j9tsitf wrote
Do you genuinely feel as if your government is doing everything they can to ensure your safety with your best interest in mind in regards to transportation/infrastructure issues, healthcare issues, environmental issues? Our Commonwealth has been very lax as of late with a lot of these things & it’s somehow a “clown take” to say that the Gov of the Commonwealth might have an interst in making sure no spotlight falls on Harrisburg!?
[deleted] t1_j9tm9ov wrote
[deleted]
Blexcr0id t1_j9t08ll wrote
Not more than they give a shit about money.
[deleted] t1_j9t32dk wrote
[deleted]
MacDynamite71 t1_j9t336c wrote
The point perhaps, is they’ll find something to complain about
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments