Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

AFD_0 t1_iu2dins wrote

Yeah, this is 100% unclear.

Either the guns were illegally sold to federal informants and then later used in a shooting? Or.. they were used in a shooting, recovered by the Sheriff and then sold to the informants? Sounds like someone else should be in trouble for this as well.

6

JennItalia269 t1_iu2x9s1 wrote

The timeline is confusing as presented. It goes like this:

Incident 1. Guns used in Roxborough HS shooting.

Incident 2. Two weeks later, guns stolen from evidence and sold to a CI.

So the sheriff didn’t sell the guns prior to use at roxborough, but presumably stole them from evidence and sold them after the fact.

9

Benanov t1_iu4eyt0 wrote

AND it happened so soon after the incident that those firearms are definitely going to be used for prosecution and trial...this wasn't just selling firearms illegally it was preventing justice from being done

3