For those worried about the PA Supreme Court’s ruling on undated ballots, it may be of some relief to you that this year’s ballot envelope is VERY unambiguous. While I personally find the ruling utterly preposterous I’d also say that the ballot itself is competently designed to compensate for it.Submitted by Trapezoidoid t3_ykckns in Pennsylvania
HonBurgher t1_iuuq0ng wrote
Reply to comment by Illustrious_Air_1438 in For those worried about the PA Supreme Court’s ruling on undated ballots, it may be of some relief to you that this year’s ballot envelope is VERY unambiguous. While I personally find the ruling utterly preposterous I’d also say that the ballot itself is competently designed to compensate for it. by Trapezoidoid
That should be in past tense. Even though counties had previously counted “wrong” dates, the Republicans’ lawsuit the PA Supreme Court ruled on had sought to stop the counting of ballots with either missing or “incorrect” dates, so now those are all supposed to be set aside, not just the undated ones.
thenewtbaron t1_iuv6xks wrote
I guess I am just concerned what an "incorrect" date is... and who decides that.
Illustrious_Air_1438 t1_iuzr58h wrote
You're right. I'm not sure how exactly they determine whether a date is incorrect though.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments