Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

M4053946 t1_iuyn25p wrote

"They claim she pushed her own agenda on students, told children their parents could be wrong about their gender, implied their parents might be lying and urged children to keep gender discussions secret from their parents."... The district is saying "The complaint filed against the district, its board and employees contains various allegations that are untrue or based on partial truths that mischaracterize events for sensational effect"

We'll see what is held up in court, if the former then that teacher should lose their license and be out of a job.

3

Unique-Public-8594 t1_iv0j7d3 wrote

Why say “if the former” like that is the more likely?

1

M4053946 t1_iv0lioo wrote

Because it's s important not to be like most of Reddit and advocate for mob rule and for the cancellation of people without evidence. Yes, the teacher likely did this with admin knowledge, but they should still get their day in court before being fired.

−6

Unique-Public-8594 t1_iv0pkm4 wrote

Why do you assume she likely tried to indoctrinate (with admin knowledge)?

I doubt that. Sounds more like phobic reaction.

4