Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

ZongMeHoff t1_iv0clc8 wrote

A lot of research is rejected. Oz isn't the only doctor. I mean look at the work Fauci did during the AIDS and COVID pandemics. Oh wait you won't take the time to really look into all of that.


[deleted] t1_iv0eoz7 wrote



ZongMeHoff t1_iv0f4t6 wrote

Didn't realize it only matters when it matters to you! Can you say hypocrisy???


Jsingles589 t1_iv31q9l wrote

Didn’t realize Fauci was getting rich by selling sham medical solutions in TV. Oh wait. He wasn’t.

You’re comparing the worlds leading expert on epidemiology to a hollywood TV doctor who is selling shit and has over ten mansions. Only one of them is, and has always been, trying to enrich themselves.


ZongMeHoff t1_iv3ajmj wrote

You're right Fauci was just doing it worldwide! Sorry...


Jsingles589 t1_iv3atoi wrote

There’s a difference between a highly skilled expert earning money by offering actually credible advice, and a tv snake oil salesman selling fake products.

Are you going to try and tell me vaccines aren’t real? Or that he invented them to make money?

You’re nuts.


ZongMeHoff t1_iv3h9d3 wrote

Don't be disrespectful, I'm not nuts. Just admit you haven't done your homework on these topics.


Jsingles589 t1_iv3hidz wrote

No dude. You’re wrong. Trying to imply that you’re more well informed than everyone else here by posting links isn’t enough to convince everyone that you’re right.

You know absolutely nothing about how informed I may or may not be. You’re just trying to take the high ground on reddit. Clearly people don’t agree with you.


ZongMeHoff t1_iv3hpeh wrote

Nice try in defending your true ignorance and lack of ability to inform "yourself"


whoisbill t1_iv0maky wrote

What about the part where Oz was banned from doing any research and presenting it because of how bad he was. Just gonna ignore that part? You know. The important part?


ZongMeHoff t1_iv1735j wrote

You mean like the 75% of research that's ignored and not peer reviewed or published? Gee maybe you should learn the very narrow statistics before responding on the topic


IrresponsibleScience t1_iv0hsgy wrote

Do you have source data to back up your claims? Would like to see it? If not your just spreading misinformation.


ZongMeHoff t1_iv16l7t wrote

Let me guess, you're probably one of those people that demand facts proof or links. Only to simply reply "I don't click on random links"🤣


IrresponsibleScience t1_iv18st3 wrote


I couldn’t dive to deep into the wall street journal’s article because of the pay wall but was able to read the other one!

I really enjoyed the opinion based parts mixed with the fact based parts!

Making narratives for someone is so great! Let’s us make a story that fits our vision!