Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

mama-moth OP t1_j374yum wrote

Reply to comment by Super_C_Complex in Are sex offenders required to notify neighbors in PA? by mama-moth

Yeah 2 counts of indecent assault on a child younger than 13 isn’t just a “oops I peed in public”. From my understanding when I read the law the minor would’ve had to come into contact with… bodily fluids in order for the neighbor to be charged with that.

They ought to be stigmatized & they should have a hard time finding housing & work. They should be put down. Dead sex offenders don’t reoffend.

−6

Super_C_Complex t1_j37c44v wrote

> They ought to be stigmatized & they should have a hard time finding housing & work.

That actually makes them more likely to reoffend.

> From my understanding when I read the law the minor would’ve had to come into contact with… bodily fluids in order for the neighbor to be charged with that

That's not necessarily the only way to be charged with indecent assault.

> They should be put down. Dead sex offenders don’t reoffend.

Most living ones don't either. But you seem falsely offended by this.

I'm sure you don't care that half your neighbors drive drunk through your neighborhood and that is more likely to cause harm to your kids.

What I'm saying is chill.

7

CharlySB t1_j38u75k wrote

Drunk drivers can go to fucking hell too iMO

3

Dr_Worm88 t1_j381or6 wrote

Congratulations you are part of the problem instead of a solution.

3

mama-moth OP t1_j3qluzt wrote

If you think letting them live is a problem & not the solution maybe you should be closely monitored… sounds like you’re a pedophile sympathizer.

−1

Dr_Worm88 t1_j3qnlu0 wrote

That’s not what I said but you lack critical thinking skills as shown in this thread.

1

Clippershipdread t1_j376q06 wrote

People are coming out of the woodwork to tell OP the guy is harmless. It’s insane. Reddit truly blows my mind.

−4

Super_C_Complex t1_j37c5s7 wrote

Not saying he is harmless just that the sex offender registry is pointless

6

Clippershipdread t1_j37cui8 wrote

That’s absurd. Shame on you. Pedo - apologist.

−4

Super_C_Complex t1_j37nfuf wrote

Is it? There is virtual zero evidence the registration requirements actually reduce recidivism, and zero evidence that people on the registry reoffend.

I'm not a pedo apologist, especially since you can get on the registry for showing your dick to seniors

2

Clippershipdread t1_j37ofw2 wrote

You say that as if showing your dick to seniors isn’t a serious sexual offense. I can’t take you seriously.

You’re telling me that you don’t want to be notified if a child rapist moved in next door to you and your child? That information is worthless to you?

And the offender list separates the degree of offender, as I’m sure you, know since you have such strong feeling on the matter.

Are you saying that you are against Megan’s Law and sex offender registries in general? Say it.

−5