Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Phantom_spook t1_j4awe6y wrote

How was he negligent? He made a good and safe shot. He shot a dog that he thought was a coyote. The dog wasn’t on a leash next to the owner and who knows what color or how thick the collar/harness it had on. Now if the dog had a blaze orange vest on the hunter would be in the wrong but that’s not what happened.

0

FerDeLancer t1_j4ckcqc wrote

It’s called identifying the target. Thats why its negligence. It was harnessed and collared. If you cant see that much you can’t see enough to take that shot

2