degggendorf t1_jeelejs wrote
Reply to comment by Lottoking888 in Meter replacement carries $200M shock: Rhode Island Energy’s advanced metering proposal ‘costs would be borne by ratepayers’ by york100
> Why do we have to pay for their burdens??? Makes no sense.
You're not sure why a business should charge enough to cover the costs of delivering their product?
Are you over at Wickford Appliance insisting that they sell appliances at a loss and remodel their stores with imaginary money from somewhere other than their customers?
Familiar_Ad1485 t1_jeetp7b wrote
There it is! Always a devils advocate troll in every thread
LilPoutinePat t1_jeey7nj wrote
Look at their comment history or this post, looks like they work for RIE
degggendorf t1_jeeyk5c wrote
So what is your opinion, businesses should charge less than it takes to provide their service, and the extra money comes from...?
[deleted] t1_jef4pal wrote
[removed]
Proof-Variation7005 t1_jeevr9r wrote
It's not devil's advocacy to point out that we live in a capitalist society and a company passing on their costs is how literally fucking every company ever has operated.
degggendorf t1_jeez1k9 wrote
> how literally fucking every company ever has operated.
Not only companies, every organization. Even if electricity were provided by a non-profiting municipal department (as it should be), they would still need to pay for their costs somehow. That money is either coming from customers paying a charge proportional to their usage, or it's coming from a broader tax that will make efficient users subsidize heavy consumers. I'm sure you can guess which I would vote for.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments