Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

ChronicCumShots t1_jdvbd7f wrote

I could see requiring it for commercial builds but requiring it for residential is ridiculous at this point

0

Status_Silver_5114 t1_jdxl3ef wrote

Except the savings and environmental impact / yeah. Ridiculous huh?

0

ChronicCumShots t1_je0x26b wrote

North facing roofs will not benefit from solar, and in addition this bill ignores the challenges of adding a whole bunch of micro grids interconnected to the utility. I’m not saying it’s a bad idea but there’s more that needs to be taken into consideration

1

Status_Silver_5114 t1_je168q6 wrote

It's addressed in the bill .

"Developers could apply for an exemption if they can demonstrate solar would be impractical, if they provide alternative forms of renewable energy generation or if they are constructing affordable housing and don’t have sufficient funding."

1

OldSchoolStitcher t1_je1dyzy wrote

Fabricating solar panels requires caustic chemicals such as sodium hydroxide and hydrofluoric acid, and the process uses water as well as electricity, the production of which emits greenhouse gases. It also creates waste. Yeah, no impact here...

0

Status_Silver_5114 t1_je1evp8 wrote

this you?

"I listen to PragerU podcasts and videos. I learn so much while I'm stitching."

If you wonder the moment where folks start tuning out what you have to say - that's the moment.

1