Submitted by therealDrA t3_11wsn0b in RhodeIsland
abovaveragefox t1_jd54yzu wrote
Reply to comment by Proof-Variation7005 in RI Rep. Quattrocchi asks Rep. Kislak if she is 'pedophile' amid debate by therealDrA
That's just not true. At all. https://sd11.senate.ca.gov/sb145
Let's see how this gets spun.
Proof-Variation7005 t1_jd55s77 wrote
Can I speak to the fox who actually reads links before posting them instead? This is too easy
abovaveragefox t1_jd56lff wrote
14 15 16 year old having sex with upto 10 years older and they don't want them on a sex offender registration. I read it and I'd say it's a step in the wrong direction. Definitely a step towards normalzing that shit in my opinion.
Proof-Variation7005 t1_jd5b635 wrote
> I read it
Assuming you aren't lying, I'm going to have to ask that you find a competent rational adult to help you read it again because you clearly did not understand it. Maybe you guys can look up the word you don't understand in the dictionayr, or have a quick discussion after it.
Cause if that is your interpretation of it, you're clearly not capable of grasping this topic without help.
Normally, I'd offer to help but I don't think you can afford my time.
abovaveragefox t1_jd5c3zc wrote
Being on a sex offender registration is part of the punishment for having sex with a minor. It's no longer mandatory. Defending that is worse than any insult youre trying to poke at my comprehension. Grasp a 24 year old who had sex with a 14 year old getting less punishment.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments