degggendorf t1_iuo284l wrote
Reply to comment by southofthetower in Little Compton residents react to town-wide hate-filled mailer with love and solidarity by GhostOpera406
So what did you intend to communicate by posting this link?
southofthetower t1_iuo3g3a wrote
that this has been discussed at nauseam. and it lists requirements that need to be met bf a third party flag can be flown on state property.
degggendorf t1_iuo3q95 wrote
The way I'm reading it, it affirms that local governments can basically do whatever they want. What's the list of requirements the SC is putting on local gov?
BitterStatus9 t1_iup2vmk wrote
The person you are arguing with is not focused on the facts you are presenting.
degggendorf t1_iup9cwm wrote
I'm not even trying to argue, I'm pulling teeth just trying to get them to explain themselves
BitterStatus9 t1_iupawnw wrote
That is clear to the rest of us. I would have backed quickly away long ago! You tried, though. Your responses made it clearer to me what the SC decision actually says (that is also relevant in this instance).
degggendorf t1_iupiryj wrote
Yeah I have the tendency to drag things out to allow others the space to make fools of themselves...
It's probably neither helpful nor healthy, but I sure enjoy it.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments