Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

RobotUnicorn046 t1_ixzsy3a wrote

Reply to comment by KindlyBrain6109 in Non-Political RI Gun Law Question by provendumb

Does it take more than a few rounds from someone with training to stop a perpetrator? Didn’t thinks so 😄

−5

KindlyBrain6109 t1_iy051u9 wrote

Tell that to any military ever <3 The 2nd amendment is for more than just hunting and stopping burglars.

When the US government stops using magazines larger than 10 rounds, then maybe the citizens won't need them either.

4

RobotUnicorn046 t1_iy0x1zf wrote

Again, no civilian militia could challenge the US forces.

1

KindlyBrain6109 t1_iy0ycdq wrote

The last few decades of military engagements involving the US disprove that statement pretty soundly. Shit we lost the Vietnam war against poorly trained, under equipped farmers.

4

1Certified1 t1_ixzzmu6 wrote

The point of the 2nd amendment is not only for hunting and self defense against “normal criminals” it’s main reason is for the defense against a tyrannical government and for the power to remain in the peoples hands.

1

RobotUnicorn046 t1_iy0wr03 wrote

I think it’s delusional that any civilian militia could do anything against the current US forces. Drones are op

3

1Certified1 t1_iy0z98z wrote

Look at Afghanistan, Vietnam, and even currently Myanmar. Soldiers in the US will not start drone striking people from their country because the government wants to take away their guns lol. Believe it or not but people in the US military are not actually robots and have independent thoughts.

8