Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Beezlegrunk OP t1_j0bwrms wrote

Reply to comment by degggendorf in Providence to install 60 more license plate cameras by Beezlegrunk

Jorge, is that you …?

−7

degggendorf t1_j0bxbx5 wrote

Why would the outgoing mayor be urging you to criticize their program?

3

Beezlegrunk OP t1_j0c5bc3 wrote

There was no criticism — just the usual defense of the status quo …

−7

degggendorf t1_j0c6rlj wrote

Where do you see me defending anything? Or are you saying that you're not criticizing, you're just defending the status quo?

All I did was call out your nonsense comparison, and question your logic with the timing comment.

I didn't present an opinion on the matter at all here, unless you count my allusion to it deserving criticism for what it actually is.

3

Beezlegrunk OP t1_j0c7k26 wrote

>”urging you to criticize”

>”I didn't present an opinion on the matter at all”

Pick one (we don’t care which) — but being mealy-mouthed isn’t helping anyone but you …

−3

degggendorf t1_j0c7ucu wrote

Those are compatible statements.

I didn't give an opinion, but want you to give your opinion based on facts.

1

[deleted] t1_j0cbrqe wrote

[removed]

−5

degggendorf t1_j0ce7nf wrote

> And the most important “fact” about a huge increase in public surveillance in Providence is exactly how closely it replicates the system in the UK …?

Idk, is it? That seemed to be your main point, which is what I was calling out.

>Here’s a fact for you: When people describe you as being “on the spectrum,” they’re not talking about wavelengths of light …

Yep, there's your trademark move...resorting to name-calling instead of simply explaining your opinions.

4