Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

galeeb t1_j677mpb wrote

Yes!! I know people just get downvoted complaining about the cameras ("well you were going over the speed limit so you got what you deserved!") but I drove through a school zone during the school day a few weeks back, guess I've never driven there since the cameras were installed. Was going to a temp job. I went back home during the day to take out my dog, and drove back. I realized later I the bright lights I saw must've been me getting a ticket - both times I went there. I was going 27mph when I looked the second time.

I realized later the speed limit sign was on the pole just as you turn, but realistically no one would look up and to the right while turning right onto a street, but I'm sure the judge you'd contest with wouldn't care. The sign is not posted in an easily viewable location except for folks already on the road driving straight.

Got up early, spent half the day at this job, and in the end I'll pay more than I made. I really disagree with folks who think it's a perfectly reasonable situation. We can be comfortable preaching about driving in a neighborhood where we know every side street and one-way, but I guarantee if you traveled to another city where you got multiple $50 tickets driving 27mph on a wide road with no traffic and no pedestrians, the sanctimonious displays would get toned down.

It also drives me crazy that Providence enjoys its liberal reputation but we charge a software engineer and a house cleaner a wildly different percentage of daily income for driving 25mph (or whatever the threshold is) or crossing a red light line 0.1 seconds late. We can have safety without usury, and Providence continues to do a somewhat poor job (admittedly, the city is diverse even in its safety measures across neighborhoods, and I'm speaking about the areas I know).

So that got me thinking about a comparable situation. Ideally we want safety for citizens, pedestrians, and drivers. I live near an actual dangerous intersection, and over the years probably witnessed a couple hundred thousand dollars worth of auto damage to unsuspecting drivers outside, quite a few injuries, and some property damage to houses, too. I've been lucky to not have seen a death yet, but one will certainly happen here with time. Notified City Council, written repeatedly, but they've done nothing to make the intersection safer. I'm confident in saying more people have been injured here than in front of any of the schools before they had cameras. Safety is not the true priority.

17

FezzikSPrestonEsq t1_j69acs4 wrote

You didn't get a ticket going 27. Tickets aren't issued until 31mph (10+mph over the 20mph school zone limit)and if you get one at 31 and go to court Caprio at least will dismiss it.

2

galeeb t1_j69ihvo wrote

That's good to hear. Sounds like it was someone behind me then. fingers crossed

1

Mountain_Bill5743 t1_j6eqgsf wrote

This guy is right about 31 triggering it. I used to drive through one multiple times a day near my house and at least 10 times it was triggered by someone speeding in the opposite lane closest to the camera. I never once got a ticket for those, although it was stressful.

2

[deleted] t1_j67kono wrote

If you were at 27, you were over the urban speed limit under state law.

Now, you can argue that it’s unreasonable, but you can’t argue you weren’t speeding.

If it takes a fine to get people to follow the surface street speed limits, I’m okay with it. People in this state drive WAY over the urban speed limit all the time, which is why there are so many hit-and-run accidents in town.

−10

FoleyisGood t1_j685zwx wrote

You must be a pig or a bootlicker

1

[deleted] t1_j68iw9t wrote

Nah. Just someone who thinks people should drive safely and who values our kids.

0