Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

tillytubeworm t1_ja52xrg wrote

It’s it’s in an unpressurized environment it will be impossible to hold more, therefore even if it’s an unpressurized environment under that definition it would still be full.

1

254LEX t1_ja5oi5j wrote

If the air were colder, it would also be more dense and therefore more would fit in the glass. But this whole discussion is pointless. It's a semantic argument, and saying that things are always (or never) full makes the word 'full' meaningless. Neither argument aligns with how the word is used, therefore they are both wrong.

2

tillytubeworm t1_ja7rad6 wrote

If the air were colder it’d be a differently pressurized environment, so within any specific environment it’d always have the potentiality to be full. So even with your semantics I think OP’s showerthought is accurate in that sense. But not in the sense of using vacuum suction to remove the air.

1