Comments
[deleted] t1_ja379kr wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_ja37czf wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_ja37mzm wrote
[removed]
Critical_Complaint21 t1_ja37vgw wrote
How? You mean they've never been absolutely full? Like when I drink even just a sip from it it's already not full
[deleted] t1_ja37x6f wrote
[removed]
Throwaweigh40 t1_ja3804g wrote
Its always at least full of air
Critical_Complaint21 t1_ja389qz wrote
Oh, sorry, blame it on my stupidity and lack of creativity lol
Dextro33 t1_ja3am8i wrote
There Technically IS water in the air. I will fight for your right to say this statement, sir.
Singer-Such t1_ja3ct8i wrote
I bet you there's at least one drinking glass inside a vacuum chamber out there. If anyone reads this who has a vacuum chamber then you should put a drinking glass in it just to prove OP wrong.
...Unless you want to claim that 3d space is a substance. Which I'm not qualified to argue about
[deleted] t1_ja3d1m3 wrote
[removed]
RealMudflapper t1_ja3dg6g wrote
Underrated comment
254LEX t1_ja3dglz wrote
full
/fo͝ol/
adjective
- containing or holding as much or as many as possible; having no empty space.
A glass holding air could contain more if the air were pressurized, therefore it is not full.
JellySp t1_ja3gf0u wrote
Wait till the guy with a turbomolecular pump in his basement sees this.
Few-Opportunity-5196 OP t1_ja3hgv6 wrote
Touché my friend!
However... Having no empty space", you yourself posted as being full too?
But agree to an extent as well with your argument. Which would also mean that they're never full because most things can be compressed under extreme pressure. For example in a black hole...
Few-Opportunity-5196 OP t1_ja3hsve wrote
Haha I thought this was Shower Thoughts?! Not Hey someone make this guy a liar thoughts?!
I did think of this but took a gamble that the likely hood is very small for a drinking glass.
gadfly1999 t1_ja3jegf wrote
I’m not qualified to argue about the contents of a vacuum either but I’m gonna throw this out there: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_fluctuation
Singer-Such t1_ja3jjnm wrote
Some of us just like to cause trouble :D sorry!
254LEX t1_ja3oi26 wrote
That's the thing about semantic arguments; no one is ever right because definitions aren't rigorous. Words mean only what they are understood to mean, and a glass full of air is understood to be empty.
Throwaweigh40 t1_ja3oq8b wrote
Ya actually this sub is primarily people saying things and other people trying to poke holes in them
Throwaweigh40 t1_ja3ouh0 wrote
When you breathe in, are your lungs full?
254LEX t1_ja3pd81 wrote
Yes, because lungs are meant to hold 1 atm air. Glasses are meant to hold liquid.
Throwaweigh40 t1_ja3ruh4 wrote
You can put anything you want in glasses. Pens, food, toenail clippings
Larkson9999 t1_ja3sux3 wrote
This sub is people mostly making obvious general statements or reposts, like all other subreddits.
[deleted] t1_ja3tbym wrote
[removed]
Few-Opportunity-5196 OP t1_ja3u6rg wrote
Is this not a new thought?
I-dont-rickroll t1_ja42q4a wrote
The same thing applies to water or any other material you fill it with.
254LEX t1_ja45bbh wrote
Then 'technically' no glass in the world has ever been full.
I-dont-rickroll t1_ja45e8d wrote
Never say never but yeah that’s the point if you really wanna be that picky
[deleted] t1_ja49a6w wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_ja4drjg wrote
[removed]
WildJackall t1_ja4dvqh wrote
Are you new? This sub is basically make op a liar
WildJackall t1_ja4e8r2 wrote
Reminds of when I argued that a hole is only a hole if it goes all the way through
freddy_guy t1_ja4kdyy wrote
That is not what ANYONE means by "full" in this context. This sub needs to fucking learn how language works.
Sparks808 t1_ja4m49s wrote
Did you guys never put a cup over your mouth and suck a vacuum so it sticks to your face? I thought that was a pretty universal childhood experience!
Reefer-eyed_Beans t1_ja4saq1 wrote
Is this the little kid that says "It's tomorrow now!" after midnight at a slumber party?
tillytubeworm t1_ja52xrg wrote
It’s it’s in an unpressurized environment it will be impossible to hold more, therefore even if it’s an unpressurized environment under that definition it would still be full.
tillytubeworm t1_ja53h7x wrote
This is the valid argument to OP
Wiernock_Onotaiket t1_ja5fyyi wrote
by extrapolation of your point nothing is ever empty and I agree
[deleted] t1_ja5gl42 wrote
[removed]
254LEX t1_ja5oi5j wrote
If the air were colder, it would also be more dense and therefore more would fit in the glass. But this whole discussion is pointless. It's a semantic argument, and saying that things are always (or never) full makes the word 'full' meaningless. Neither argument aligns with how the word is used, therefore they are both wrong.
[deleted] t1_ja5op01 wrote
[removed]
Redbeard4006 t1_ja5pywa wrote
LOL, no. It has occurred to many people.
High_quality_image t1_ja5sk93 wrote
Put a glass in the plain of um existing
[deleted] t1_ja5uqcn wrote
[removed]
carlrieman t1_ja63cf7 wrote
This is exectly how language works! You saying "not what anyone" is already a statement that You yourself don't know how language works. One person thought outside of everyday context thus some think that way. Incorrect use of anyone much?
What it means for space to be empty or full. From physics standpoint even in vacuum there is still quantum foam.
TheShredda t1_ja6mxpk wrote
Except water is incompressible
Climate_Sweet t1_ja6u8xp wrote
water is incompressible
fluffycritter t1_ja6uzpb wrote
Not with that attitude
[deleted] t1_ja6uzvu wrote
[removed]
SoccerGamerGuy7 t1_ja6wekp wrote
With air, Yea
With Liquid, not always
With solid, At best 50% on occasion with ice cubes
hysterical_mushroom t1_ja6wu72 wrote
The glass is always full, reguardless if it is full of water, air, or water and air.
jmpires t1_ja6y812 wrote
I’d say a glass is full when it overflows upon adding more fluid
Ok_Lifeguard_6508 t1_ja74gff wrote
Is it though? It's denser at extreme depth. I'm trying to get my tired brain around this and failing.
Ok_Lifeguard_6508 t1_ja74k62 wrote
So ... it's full just below the pressure that causes it to break?
77GoldenTails t1_ja7ctre wrote
I prefer to call it ‘lets correct, the shower thoughts of those needing enlightenment.’
SpiteAspect t1_ja7m28e wrote
Fill your cars combustion chambers up with water and tell me if it compresses lol
Arkhangelzk t1_ja7o0xe wrote
So now we have to say “of this very specific liquid” every time we use this phrase, rather than assuming everyone inherently understands?
Sometimes I really do believe humanity is getting dumber.
tillytubeworm t1_ja7rad6 wrote
If the air were colder it’d be a differently pressurized environment, so within any specific environment it’d always have the potentiality to be full. So even with your semantics I think OP’s showerthought is accurate in that sense. But not in the sense of using vacuum suction to remove the air.
[deleted] t1_ja7u9xk wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_ja9lyvb wrote
[removed]
Ok_Lifeguard_6508 t1_jaamqfv wrote
Of course not because the conrods will bend first. But as an awake person I can now remember that water is indeed denser at great depth (to an extent that is reflectee in the anatomy of the fish that live there). So it is compressible it's just not easy.
Showerthoughts_Mod t1_ja36g5m wrote
This is a friendly reminder to read our rules.
Remember, /r/Showerthoughts is for showerthoughts, not "thoughts had in the shower!"
(For an explanation of what a "showerthought" is, please read this page.)
Rule-breaking posts may result in bans.