Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

Showerthoughts_Mod t1_jac3sxw wrote

This is a friendly reminder to read our rules.

Remember, /r/Showerthoughts is for showerthoughts, not "thoughts had in the shower!"

(For an explanation of what a "showerthought" is, please read this page.)

Rule-breaking posts may result in bans.

1

Charisma_Modifier OP t1_jac3u9o wrote

So essentially, deer decline starts with about 75% left and ours starts with like 83%. Why do we peak so early in our lifespan?

0

Flintly t1_jac5bxr wrote

Sexual peak is late teens but strength is late 20s early 30s

4

TJRINZ t1_jac8bmt wrote

Physical performance is more mid 20s and endurance is 30s. Humans are endurance animals so I’d say that’s a better way of determining peak performance. Either way, 17.5 years isn’t a benchmark on any standard. And to respond to your comment about the Olympians being young, the average age is 27. In my opinion, we see younger athletes because they have gone through more and better training at younger ages than older athletes have. There are also more serious athletes in youth nowadays than there were years ago, so the probability of finding a kid who is gifted or more dedicated to a sport is higher.

5

Charisma_Modifier OP t1_jac8w6a wrote

Average of all Olympians is 27, but there are a lot of events that are easier for older athletes to be competitive at. Gymnasts are typical much younger than 27, swimmers are younger. I wasn't just talking to strength, which is why is worded it as performance/potential (maybe I should have worded it more clearly). And it's not just Olympics, look at something like MotoGP, very mentally and physically demanding, needs high reaction time...they are considered OLD when entering mid 20s. I'm not claiming to be a scientific expert in this, it was a shower thought. But I appreciate your input though.

−2

Charisma_Modifier OP t1_jac95o5 wrote

Yeah I'm not a science expert either, I thought that was the point of shower thoughts, but oh well.

I agree that your theory makes sense. And my 17% is based off of max age (oldest human was 125) which is why I compared to max age of deer (even though it's rare deer make it to 17 in wild) for some continuity.

1

mcshadypants t1_jacar6a wrote

I dont think 18 is peak physical age for people bud lol youre a decade off.

5

sandrews1313 t1_jace6y2 wrote

while there have been unique outliers, you'd be hard pressed to get one past 12 in the safety of captivity.

if you're going down that road, why don't you lead with the premise that humans live to 115?

not sure how you can have an average maximum, but you do you.

1

Charisma_Modifier OP t1_jacgce2 wrote

Sandrews1313 is on a crusade to comment all over this post haha, yikes. Sorry to have bothered you to the point you spent your morning doing that. Weird way to spend one's time but....you do you.

0

got_lukky t1_jaczpnw wrote

This is actually not factual at all. As a human you don’t peak until your 30’s and then You can stay maximally functional for decades assuming you attempt to care for yourself. Assuming you live a healthy and active life, you shouldn’t have low T until your 60’s. And if you diet and exercise regularly, the chances of a life like this are fairly good

3