Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

339jimmyr t1_je7swf9 wrote

Get back in the shower and rethink why you felt the need to add “/womankind”

38

SnarkyBear53 t1_je86ay1 wrote

and completely leave out /animalkind and /plantkind. They are living on this planet too, you know!

3

SIMPSONBORT t1_je7wz0z wrote

I thought because just mankind I’d have someone else say “ hey why didn’t u say womankind “

Seems like Better to say it then not I guess ?

−21

kirjavva t1_je7xcye wrote

Well, mankind already refers to Homo sapiens, but sure, there's always someone to take the "man" out of it...

5

The_Quibbler t1_je852i9 wrote

The etymological root of "woman" is wife of man, so tripping over ourselves in the name of sensitivity isn't really accomplishing anything here. See also: person.

I quibble.

4

Megalocerus t1_je803r0 wrote

But it was closer when there were dinosaurs. It had a better view!

3

khamelean t1_je86ka5 wrote

Mankind: human beings considered collectively; the human race:

It’s perfectly acceptable to use “mankind” to refer all humans.

2

mortimus9 t1_je8ejpi wrote

Okay but why is it a problem to use womankind?

0

khamelean t1_je8p1rg wrote

Though the may sound similar, they have different etymology and different meaning.

1

Upper_Initial7918 t1_je8c6ma wrote

The meaning of mankind: "human beings considered collectively; the human race."

Anyone who argues against it, feminist or not, is an idiot.

2

attathathappaend t1_jegr5wh wrote

The word ‘man’ can be used for all humans, which is why we have words like mankind and not womankind

2