wildadragon t1_j2287rq wrote
Reply to comment by Ophiomancy_Xaxax in There are no ambidextrous people, only people living in denial of their disability. by Ophiomancy_Xaxax
So you used specific words and didn't realize they had literal meanings?
>Yeah, well, I didn't think
You certainly didnt.
Ophiomancy_Xaxax OP t1_j2712e0 wrote
This comment is stupid. Words have meanings. Sentences also have interpretations, and this sentence in particular I explained to you was to be interpreted non-literally.
Look, are you actually suggesting that I am on the one hand saying ambidextrous people do not literally exist in this world while simultaneously calling myself ambidextrous? And that you have actually come in here and remedied the situation by pointing out my error? Is that what you think your role was here?
Hey, thanks, man!
That you could have spent as much time as you have here without ever moving beyond this, even after I walked you through it, is really something. You didn't for a second consider the fact that I may have had some point I was making beyond the apparent contradiction that has occupied so much of your attention? Not possible?
wildadragon t1_j271l71 wrote
That's exactly what you wrote there is no "interpretation" if it was something vague maybe, but you made absolute statements.
>There are no ambidextrous people
>I am ambidextrous
Like what's there to interpret?
You're welcome, glad I could help you see the error of your ways. Learn from your mistakes.
Ophiomancy_Xaxax OP t1_j22cngo wrote
Ooh snap
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments