MinniesWorld t1_j24125g wrote
I don’t understand why being able to use both hands equally would be considered a disability. What denial exists there?
Ophiomancy_Xaxax OP t1_j26skym wrote
Perhaps it was poorly written. As I attempted to clarify, it is the non-ambidextrous people who are essentially disabled. The ambidextrous label is completely unnecessary, because you are supposed to be able to use both of your hands.
Ophiomancy_Xaxax OP t1_j26yuc6 wrote
Hang on, did this make sense? I've typed this something like a dozen times and not one person has indicated that they have understood me to any degree whatsoever.
MinniesWorld t1_j270lzc wrote
Originally, it sounded like you were saying that ambidextrous people were disabled, and although you have tried to walk it back, I think it is an uphill task, and I’m not entirely certain it’s going to be worth the effort
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments