Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Strawhat-dude t1_j29nmem wrote

No. The universe is always the same size. Its not smaller for anyone

29

OldHanBrolo t1_j29pmyn wrote

Please tell me what size the universe is good sir. I know you came here to look smart by correcting a shower thought so I figured I would give you a platform to look smart on. Please tell me the exact size of the universe, thanks

−12

Suspicious-Notice-98 t1_j29qxv2 wrote

Now you are trying to look what, but actually sound stupid. The universe is the same size for everyone regardless of their size. The universe doesn't change size depending on who is looking at it. You don't need to know the size of an object to know this.

8

PrestigiousLambb t1_j29rshl wrote

You should read about quantum physics before stating that the “the universe is the same size for everyone regardless of their size” Size is irrelevant/undefinable after certain point

−2

drainisbamaged t1_j29rwdm wrote

So what size is it?

The shower thought is more accurate to modern physics than your refutation so I remain curious to see how you define it.

I mean zoggles Mankind still can't measure the coastline of England and you're over here knowing the size of the entire universe.thats pretty impressive.

−11

Suspicious-Notice-98 t1_j29ubvu wrote

I believe I said you don't need to know the size of it. Let's say a house is 1000 square feet. It will be that size for everyone regardless of how big they are. Your may be able to fit more of one person in it than another, but that doesn't change the size of the house.

9

drainisbamaged t1_j29unak wrote

Relative to Paul Wight, that house is much smaller than it is relative to Kevin Hart.

When it comes to the universe, relativity to the observer is immensely important. So much so they granted the idea the highest military rank possible when coining the term General Relativity.

−7

Suspicious-Notice-98 t1_j29w630 wrote

That's why it would need to be measured with a standardized tool. You can't take a 5 ft something and a 6 ft something, measure the universe with both and then say that since it takes less 6 ft things than 5 ft things than the universes size is smaller or bigger.

Yes the universe is expanding, but if you pick a point in time, you'd have to measure it with one object to determine it's size based on that object and then you'd be able to define it's size which then wouldn't be any different for the other objects on it. Just because one object perceives the size to be different, doesn't mean that it actually is.

3

drainisbamaged t1_j29xba1 wrote

The OP speaks relatively while you're speaking absolutely. Maybe you've misunderstood what was said?

At that..you don't freeze frame the universe, that's not how the simulator works. This is same concept as the coastline paradox. It's not just about making everything stop while you grab a tape measurer

−5

DontHitTurtles t1_j2cmmgr wrote

All of this aside, the math is way off. If for the sake of argument we accept OP's claim that the universe is 1 foot smaller for the 6 foot person, we would then have to say 1 foot = 20 percent of the universe for the rest to be true. This is so far off that it is absurd. OP is wrongfully comparing the size difference between the two people (one person is 20 percent smaller than the other person) to come up with the 20 percent number instead of between each person and the universe.

2

drainisbamaged t1_j2cquiq wrote

You're applying a ruler to relativity and infinity. Of course your math isn't working out, that was Einstein's point!

1