Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Mitchelltrt t1_j6m3ows wrote

False. "Heat" or "thermal energy" is more like micro-kinetic energy, as it is the energy of motion at the atomic scale. The faster the molecules are vibrating, the higher the temperature.

9

Crux_AMVS24 OP t1_j6m4bpq wrote

Could you go look up some stuff about the zeroth law of thermodynamics(or read some of my replies on other comments). I have a book to recommend if you’d like. I’m tired of getting downvoted to oblivion cuz the general public has misconceptions about certain things and don’t even hear me out

−5

notveggiesoup t1_j6med20 wrote

You're not really explaining your point so no wonder you're getting downvotes

6

Crux_AMVS24 OP t1_j6mfitn wrote

It’s hard to explain it in the title, since it’s only two sentences but I’ve been trying. Just look at some of the other comments

0

MegaMinerd t1_j6ntt21 wrote

I looked it up and saw stuff about the equilibrium of connected bodies. I don't understand how that is related.

1

Crux_AMVS24 OP t1_j6nz9am wrote

That’s the point, it’s not related. What you read is(vaguely) the definition of temperature. It’s just a physical property that determines what would happen when two bodies touch each other. If they are at “different temperatures”, some process(which we can call heat transfer) would take place from one body to the other. If the two objects have the same number assigned to them(ie, their temperature) then there will be no interaction or process that occurs. Temperature, by definition is not a measure of internal energy but it IS related to it. That relation is either directly proportional, or inversely proportional, depending on which convention you take. Humans chose the one where hot objects have a bigger number, and so we chose the relation of temperature being directly proportional to kinetic energy

0