Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

timbus1234 t1_j6761uy wrote

Reply to comment by arglarg in Some women get paid to lose their virginity while some men pay to lose theirs by RedDogs48

you could make that argument, and thats a valid argument, however you'd need to factor in the time spent (both sexual and non sexual) with your partner and average it out to an hourly wage, then id say on average its cheaper for the man to be married

1

arglarg t1_j676lnc wrote

You'll certainly get more time together with a spouse, but it might be more than you need, and it's not all quality time. If you pay only for the time you need, a Relationship As A Service model (RAAS) could save you money, compared to in-house hosting, but that depends on your personal use case.

2

timbus1234 t1_j6774rx wrote

men paying for a prostitute are paying for companionship, men are more than capable of gratifying their own sexual urges for free, so the X factor here is companionship not sex, which you get more of for cheaper in a marriage,

however if your argument is that you do not need women and that paying a higher price for less time is cheaper in the long run,all i will say to that is that men in general are very lonely and depressed without women.

0