Submitted by mpd763 t3_zq35g0 in StamfordCT
JaqenHghar t1_j0x82bc wrote
Reply to comment by Dot8911 in Moving to Stamford - Looking for advice by mpd763
Fair point but it’s negligent to not have factored that in when converting from something that old. Not cutting them any slack. They sold that off quick and avoided liability.
Dot8911 t1_j0xbke6 wrote
In hindsight, the building never should have been renovated in the first place. But if the change in the water table happened after the renovation, it would have been impossible to spot in advance. Hard to say if the engineering survey missed something, or if a change elsewhere destabilized the building. Regardless, sucks for all involved.
JaqenHghar t1_j0xc5m6 wrote
Totally. And I’m just being a jerk. Lots of nice stuff in harbor point.
Dot8911 t1_j0xe6di wrote
Oh no, I totally get it. Any time an entire building needs to be vacated, it is right and fair to criticize the developer for that. BLT absolutely needs to account for this moving forward. At a minimum so the buildings can be properly insured.
Hopefully the city has enough info to reach a proper conclusion about the root cause, because if a change somewhere else made this happen we want to avoid repeating that mistake too. Cheers!
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments