Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

halfwayhipster2 t1_j11mhjk wrote

Something about not agreeing on the terms of the lease. There is a story with limited info in the Stamford advocate

14

ninjacereal t1_j13y7sb wrote

Didn't they close a restaurant and replace it with a different concept a couple months ago, which also closed? Why would you change concepts if you were doing well? Why would you open a new concept if the lease terms were so bad?

My guess is they used their $225k PPP loan to expand by opening a second restaurant concept, which failed. They tried to change that second restaurant concept earlier this year, but by then it was too little too late - the free money was gone.

5

ruthless_apricot t1_j11qhon wrote

Maybe the building was owned by BLT? Wouldn’t surprise me if those scumbags hiked the rent an outrageous amount

−1

Athrynne t1_j13odq6 wrote

No, they are owned by another company. BLT sold all the Y&T buildings around 2018.

4