Submitted by LifeTableWithChairs t3_11nqogo in UpliftingNews
Comments
itwasthedingo t1_jbp5qf8 wrote
Careful, this is a potentially negative opinion lol
TechyGuyInIL t1_jbp5t66 wrote
I'm leaving it at this. Lol
[deleted] t1_jbsysyv wrote
[removed]
way2funni t1_jbp5an4 wrote
It's all part of the new world order. this line from the press release tells you what's up:
"...The deal, struck in Beijing this week amid its ceremonial National People's Congress, represents a major diplomatic victory for the Chinese as Gulf states perceive the United States slowly withdrawing from the wider Middle East. ....
Iran is OPEC's 3rd largest producer of crude oil and 5th largest producer of natural gas.
SA has 2nd largest oil reserves in the world. Between the two they have enough oil to last 200 + years each. Collectively a bit more.
tl;dr China is thirsty. Playing matchmaker/dealmaker ensures the taps stay open with multiple redundancies.
Sk-yline1 t1_jbri04w wrote
Tbh though, it’s good for all countries to not have a massive war in the Middle East that would likely be sponsored by opposing sides like the US and Russia, could drag on for a decade, and would cause gas and energy prices to double
Extension-Ad-2760 t1_jbp8nb3 wrote
It was going to happen eventually. Both horrible countries. Although hopefully Iran's revolution is successful
BigDickOriole t1_jbqfxkl wrote
Nothing about this is uplifting. Why would we want two tyrannical regimes to be friends?
Cwallace98 t1_jbqrlmx wrote
It could be good for Yemen. The two have been fighting a proxy war there, causing so much death and suffering for the Yemeni people.
Just a possibility though.
[deleted] t1_jbrszf0 wrote
The alternative is the working people of Iran and Saudi Arabia continue killing eachother. Why should they, or anyone for that matter, want that?
LittleBirdyLover t1_jbrxbaq wrote
Beneficial for the U.S.
[deleted] t1_jbsj3pk wrote
[deleted]
[deleted] t1_jbsz25z wrote
[removed]
AutoModerator t1_jboe2we wrote
Reminder: this subreddit is meant to be a place free of excessive cynicism, negativity and bitterness. Toxic attitudes are not welcome here.
All Negative comments will be removed and will possibly result in a ban.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
[deleted] t1_jbp6p59 wrote
[removed]
Glc12345 t1_jbr4hga wrote
Brokered by China. Maybe this sub should be called News for the Naive.
[deleted] t1_jbrtdob wrote
The White House said the Saudis kept the U.S. informed of the talks and that it welcomes any moves that de-escalate tensions in the region. Countries around the Middle East and the United Nations' secretary-general also responded positively to the news.
In other words, everyone who matters is welcoming the news.
Glc12345 t1_jbrwywe wrote
That's just normal public relations. It wouldn't serve US interests for the US government to openly say to the world, "Oh man, that sucks. Dislike." The truth is that while de-escalating tensions is a good thing, we are also interested in other things like human rights. China brokered this deal by not bringing up human rights violations... because they are human rights violators themselves. If the cost of peace is oppression, then I personally wouldn't consider that uplifting news. I'd like to think others would agree.
[deleted] t1_jbrxm3n wrote
> we are also interested in other things like human rights.
The country allied with Saudi Arabia? Virtually nothing happened when MBS had a journalist hacked up, and nothing happened while Saudis were causing famine in Yemen. I think how selective the US is with "Human Rights" is rather curious.
Glc12345 t1_jbrxw5c wrote
That is fair. Let me rephrase: we SHOULD also be interested in other things like human rights. It is bad when we fall short in this regard. Both examples you mentioned are good examples.
CryptoYaar t1_jbsvcnz wrote
Sorry to burst your bubble, but the USA's own record in human rights is pretty bad. It would be nice of things can start getting better from within the house.
Glc12345 t1_jbtrbrt wrote
By comparison to? The USA at least tries and often fails versus just not trying at all. Also, the USA's record on a lot of stuff is really crappy. Why would I want the USA to do more crappy things like support a China brokered deal that ignores human rights?
CryptoYaar t1_jbvc6nr wrote
Again, usa is as bad as China, SA and Iran when it come to HR violations. That is why no one gives a damn when US pretends to be the moral police.
ScootyMcPooty t1_jbqroj4 wrote
I'm told a ribbon cutting ceremony will be held next week, where the two representatives from each peace loving nation will hold hands on a sword together and behead a dissident to cement the newly established relations.
Evening_Condition_76 t1_jbood72 wrote
Our enemy Iran and our enemy the Arabs strengthening relationships is not uplifting news..
Surfs_The_Box t1_jbop5ij wrote
Our* lol
Bonjourap t1_jbxjxk1 wrote
Not everyone is American, more peace in the Middle East is a good thing
Evening_Condition_76 t1_jbyleo2 wrote
Not everyone is evil. Not really peace when you have messed up country's alliance
TechyGuyInIL t1_jbp4v2q wrote
I'm not sure how I feel about this