Comments
Iwasnamediann t1_it2m3w4 wrote
We don't need collaborative efforts to conserve what we are losing, we simply need humans to behave better and to respect the environment.
tehjeffman t1_it2rmjd wrote
Have you been to a Walmart or mall? Even if we used that money to pay people to be better, they wouldn't.
awesomedan24 t1_it33miv wrote
Evidently we do need that because they wont.
Harmlessturtle t1_it3gxln wrote
That a lot of words being used to describe collaborative efforts to conserve what we are loosing.
[deleted] t1_it3jumd wrote
[removed]
33957210 t1_it3no8c wrote
Humans are a virus with shoes they aren’t gonna start to respect shit.
Individual-Text-1805 t1_it3uasc wrote
Mhm and how might we restore what's gone? Tell people to be better? Will that bring back the habitats quicker? I don't think so
[deleted] t1_it3v6eo wrote
[deleted]
Hand-Picked-Anus t1_it3ygia wrote
You could spend $70MM in one town and still have massive problems.
Asmallbitofanxiety t1_it4074v wrote
See: superfund
And we're still making these messes faster than we're cleaning them up
KibblesNBitxhes t1_it418pj wrote
I think we are too greedy and ignorant as a species to save ourselves. We will continue killing the earth and its inhabitants as well as ourselves until it is too late to stop
Hand-Picked-Anus t1_it45py7 wrote
Just build schools on top, no one will know.
unassumingdink t1_it46qns wrote
"Well, it's a fairly good first step," and then the second step never comes. Feel like I've seen this one before. On about a hundred different issues.
fpsmoto t1_it472l9 wrote
How many billions would you spend to prevent a war?
ndolphin t1_it47tfh wrote
Yup. Sadly.
Frumpy_little_noodle t1_it4c1me wrote
So said species are going extinct then? 😮💨
Sharkgutz17 t1_it4dfm3 wrote
This is nothing
BrokenCankle t1_it4nl7o wrote
You are correct but maybe that just shows this was posted in the wrong sub. Is it uplifting? Its an incredibly small amount to be used nationally to do something we should be prioritizing but we are still treating it like it's not at a critical point. It's distressing to constantly be reminded how quickly life on this planet is going extinct so even an article like this that seems positive really isn't. It's like saying a raped child finally got the abortion she needed... I mean that's great but is it uplifting that any of that happened the way it did? We might want to raise the bar on what uplifting means, maybe not require a horrible event to require "good".
NotaChonberg t1_it4sjol wrote
Because 67 million is an insignificant amount for protecting nature in a time where nature is collapsing.
stitchbones t1_it4u2we wrote
It's true that this is not enough, but it's a good start. If you think more should be done then tell your Senators and Representative to support the Recovering America's Wildlife Act
Eruionmel t1_it4x5zb wrote
The problem is that it's not uplifting to report on a government spending a ton of money on "conserving" specific species when the entire planet's ecology is collapsing around our ears. We likely have less than a century left of this planet before billions of people die due to the collapse of our food sources and water supplies. Spending $70m on trying to saves the newts isn't uplifting in the face of that knowledge, so it really shouldn't be on this sub.
Oryxhasnonuts t1_it5a3jk wrote
Some Universities get more than this yearly for simply being affiliated with a Conference
So while that’s good
One University compared to an entire state and the state is using it to help stop species extinction
Drop of water in the ocean
Mcdibbles t1_it5e71n wrote
>less than a century left of this planet before billions of people die due to the collapse of our food sources and water supplies
My brother in Jeebus, we probably have until 2030 before global crop failure starts, with drought being the primary issue, followed by heat and wildfire.
Eruionmel t1_it80537 wrote
Oh, for sure. I'm just usually conservative about time frames when I'm talking about it so that people are more likely to listen. People just shut down and brush it off as conspiracy if you start throwing around dates that are only a few years away. The collapse of the crab populations in Alaska is one of the first in what will be a cascade of collapses, and it's happening now, forget even 7 years out.
AutoModerator t1_it2ksvl wrote
Reminder: this subreddit is meant to be a place free of excessive cynicism, negativity and bitterness. Toxic attitudes are not welcome here.
All Negative comments will be removed and will possibly result in a ban.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.