Comments
Quality-Services t1_it5mo7k wrote
800000 Chinese vessels just entered the chat.
Bacontoad OP t1_it5muel wrote
The area is protected by the United States Navy, so I think not.
Dazzling-Rule-9740 t1_it5sjsa wrote
Think again
GrandNibbles t1_it5thi3 wrote
think again again
GrandNibbles t1_it5tjgu wrote
Fuck yeah environments actually recovering. That's some rare news for sure
Ok-Sweetums t1_it5z6lm wrote
Ok, now protect the rest of the oceans.
cutelyaware t1_it62owr wrote
Don't think. There is only do or do not. There is no think.
cutelyaware t1_it6345z wrote
That was my thought too, so I looked it up, and the answer is yes indeed! As strange as it is to hear me say this, thank you GW Bush.
PS: Clinton helped
p-d-ball t1_it6787z wrote
hahaha, I feel the same way.
kemster7 t1_it6dtxx wrote
Nah, if there's anything America has been careful to maintain it's overwhelmingly excessive amounts of disrespectful levels of disgusting quantities of military spending. That's not even including the secret side funding they can't disclose for "national security" reasons.
P_ZERO_ t1_it6jm8i wrote
How would that be possible?
Ok-Sweetums t1_it6kfbh wrote
How would it not be possible?
P_ZERO_ t1_it6kltw wrote
Well considering this area belongs to the US/Hawaii and contains many land masses, it’s a slightly different story to an area 120 times larger belonging to dozens of nations with varying attitudes to this sort of thing.
Bit more difficult to police.
Gala_Galavanting t1_it6p0st wrote
I came here to say this, lol!
JohnathonLongbottom t1_it7i7v7 wrote
Quick, get the fishing boats there! We don't have much time to deplete the fish populations.
[deleted] t1_it7oqc0 wrote
[deleted]
[deleted] t1_it7q0ay wrote
[deleted]
hazpat t1_it8927k wrote
Thanks! It's important to check funding on pro fishing research. There are many big companies that like to influence fisheries data. This one checks out fine.
nursecarmen t1_it8970j wrote
It is amazing to me how quickly fish stocks bounce back. We should be constantly doing this on a rotating basis. It would actually help the industry.
imonmyhighhorse t1_it89o1b wrote
“Overwhelmingly excessive amounts of disrespectful levels of disgusting quantities of military spending”
Just use one adjective, if any. Your statement would be more impactful as “excessive military spending”.
badmonkey7 t1_it8vf1i wrote
Well aren’t you on your high horse?
Dazzling-Rule-9740 t1_it97fea wrote
True. I still liked it
AutoModerator t1_it5m7yv wrote
Reminder: this subreddit is meant to be a place free of excessive cynicism, negativity and bitterness. Toxic attitudes are not welcome here.
All Negative comments will be removed and will possibly result in a ban.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.