Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Gottapopemall t1_iuavzqr wrote

I’m not trolling anything. I don’t think that denying something on religious grounds makes chic-fil-a a “terrible” company especially considering a lot of people don’t think that birth control should be covered by insurance in at all. I’m not a religious man and I’m not claiming to understand all the tribulations of being a woman but outside of regulating periods, clearing acne, and MAYBE helping with cramps, I don’t see why condoms wouldn’t suffice.

To me, you seem like an angry and defensive person looking to make an enemy out of anyone that disagrees with your views. And funnily enough, that is the only way anyone could see chic-fil-a as a terrible company.

0

16066888XX98 t1_iuaz6va wrote

You are making my point for me. You can't see why this is much more than "regulating periods, clearing acne and MAYBE helping with cramps" because you are not a woman. However, you believe that a corporation should be able to decide whether thousands of employees should receive gender-specific health care (not your gender)? The fact is that if you are not a woman, you can not possibly understand what goes into the complexity of our medical care. Certainly, my employers interest in "The Lord" should have no impact on whether or not I can get care for dozens of different issues, because that care includes something that has one of it's uses labeled as "birth control".

By the way, Chick-fil-a wouldn't want you to use condoms either, if they could control that.

6

Gottapopemall t1_iub0dal wrote

So your belief that they should pay for your birth control supersedes their right to practice their religion and run their private business in line with those values. I don’t think that’s very fair.

1

16066888XX98 t1_iubdqlp wrote

Haha. The company doesn't pay for medication. The company subsidized health insurance that follows the guidelines of the AHCA.

3