Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Sariel007 OP t1_ixv5kr0 wrote

One dose cure instead of "...patients will undergo regular infusions of their missing clotting factor. Though effective at stopping spontaneous bleeding, these infusions are not a cure and in the most severe cases, people may need to get them every two to three days—a costly and time-consuming measure. "

26

AinsiSera t1_ixvnosp wrote

I read elsewhere that those treatments easily add up to $100k/month, so honestly $3.5 mil is pretty cost effective competitively.

16

RO489 t1_ixvt06y wrote

Depending if your insurance/ employer agree. Since insurance is mostly tied to employment in the US, they aren't firing the math of a lifetime cost. I'd imagine single payer would be a no brainer, but if you are an employer, it'll increase everyone's cost.

Another argument in favor of single payer.

5

scarlet_sage t1_ixvnm9y wrote

It did not appear to be a cure, though it doesn't explain why.

>It also appeared to lower the rate of bleeding problems by 54% in one trial, and it reduced the need for regular infusions of clotting factors....

>it should reduce the frequency of expensive transfusions; they also say that the drug’s effectiveness is expected to last for several years at least.

3