Submitted by je97 t3_z7wnkt in UpliftingNews
Quixophilic t1_iyahvjp wrote
Reply to comment by bustervich in Rolls-Royce successfully tests hydrogen-powered jet engine by je97
>nuclear powered planes
Ah yes! Every plane crash a mini-Chernobyl!
Master_Bayters t1_iyaos3a wrote
Actually a plane would never use a bwr reactor like Chernobyl. So a lot of measures could be implemented to seal the core and prevent meltdown... Mass production of small nuclear reactors never advanced due to the bad reputation nuclear has, not because it's impractical. We would have solved the energy crysis and reach carbon zero a.long time ago. Not to mention saving 5 million lifes due to air pollution reduction.
bustervich t1_iyb0u2n wrote
Designing a plane that could fly on nuclear power has been tried before early in the nuclear age. I don’t know if technology exists today to make it practical, but making it safe in the event of a crash is another story.
People generally think of black boxes on planes as indestructible, and they are pretty tough. But they’re good for protecting a few memory chips from impact and thermal forces. But even though the boxes are in the tail and designed so that the entire front of the plane acts as a crumple zone, there have been crashes where the black boxes were never found, even though the crash location was known and on land. Now imagine trying to build a containment vessel for some sort of reactor that can keep a plane crash from turning into a dirty bomb while also being light enough to be flown on a plane that also has to carry passengers and cargo.
Master_Bayters t1_iyca84x wrote
We lost almost 40 years of comercial nuclear study due to the fear mongering that happened after Chernobyl. Some is understandable. I was just stating it wasn't impossible, but the industry went on a completely different path. And yes, to seal a core from impacts would be a pain in the *ss
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments