Submitted by je97 t3_z7wnkt in UpliftingNews
UnCommonSense99 t1_iyet61t wrote
Reply to comment by dustofdeath in Rolls-Royce successfully tests hydrogen-powered jet engine by je97
You are technically correct..... But given a choice between having some small fuel tanks full of biodiesel or some much larger and heavier fuel tanks full of hydrogen; what do you think will work best?
( I assume you realise that it's much easier to run a jet engine on diesel than it is to run it on hydrogen)
dustofdeath t1_iyexm6x wrote
Hydrogen is 2.8x more energy dense than kerosene for the same unit of mass. But needs four times more volume.
Meaning you actually need less fuel - so it almost negates the increased volume issue. Especially if the efficiency of fuel to thrust is better than fossil fuels.
I believe AirBus is already planning a commercial plane by 2035. So there likely have been developments on how to properly store liquid hydrogen (that eliminates the volume issue). The ZEROe.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments