Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

[deleted] t1_iz5ol8q wrote

Reply to comment by [deleted] in Dog reunited with family 7 days after falling from cliff on Vancouver Island by Born2bBread

[deleted]

19

[deleted] t1_iz5pn9i wrote

[deleted]

5

[deleted] t1_iz5q16q wrote

[deleted]

0

BostonBrandToots t1_iz69uuz wrote

Yes. They should have shot a kid for falling into a pen ... fucking what?

Value of something's life is entirely in the eye of the beholder. No getting around the fact that there are people who value the lives of their dogs over complete people strangers. And you know what, they aren't wrong to do so.

6

[deleted] t1_iz5qi3d wrote

[deleted]

3

[deleted] t1_iz5r3bc wrote

[deleted]

2

[deleted] t1_iz5rsw9 wrote

[deleted]

7

TarantinoFan23 t1_iz5xp9y wrote

When animals pay taxes, they can have emergency services.

−6

BostonBrandToots t1_iz6a1yf wrote

>When animals pay taxes, they can have emergency services.

I pay the city to have pets. So fork it over, dumb ass lol

4

[deleted] t1_iz5qrv0 wrote

[deleted]

−2

[deleted] t1_iz5rcf5 wrote

[deleted]

5

[deleted] t1_iz5rv74 wrote

[deleted]

4

BostonBrandToots t1_iz6ad7n wrote

>I'm not going to argue about this

Continues to spew all over the thread

Fucking maulding

1

PirateJinbe t1_iz5p81m wrote

Whether you like it or not, thats quite subjective.

−7

[deleted] t1_iz5povd wrote

[deleted]

4

No_Instruction2123 t1_iz5s44c wrote

I don’t know about you but I’d pretty much let every single one of my neighbors die if it meant it would save my cats 🤷‍♂️

−2

[deleted] t1_iz5skl6 wrote

[deleted]

−1

No_Instruction2123 t1_iz5tac1 wrote

A legal argument is not a moral one. No one ever appeals to the law in these kinds of conversations, that’s just leading to an easy debunking. Just take India’s reverence for cows, they’re considered much more important than human lives in nearly every sense.

Also that’s not how criminal negligence works, I’m in no place of responsibility to risk my life to save yours UNLESS I’m registered as an EMT or nurse or something and take that legal responsibility on as my own. You sound like a high schooler that took one Gov class

5

[deleted] t1_iz5vfjs wrote

[deleted]

−1

No_Instruction2123 t1_iz5w4e1 wrote

Dude….. that’s the law in nearly every English speaking country, which I’m assuming by your proper use of English you are from, but maybe I’m wrong.

It’s called “duty to rescue”, nobody has the legal responsibility to save anyone else if it involves endangering themselves. And it should absolutely stay that way, you’re insane if you think otherwise.

6

[deleted] t1_iz5xezw wrote

[deleted]

1

No_Instruction2123 t1_iz5xjuk wrote

In what other possible situation would I have to choose between my cats and neighbors? Seriously?

1

[deleted] t1_iz6167s wrote

[deleted]

0

No_Instruction2123 t1_iz62hs2 wrote

I have no obligation to risk my life in a fire to save my neighbors. If I choose to save my cats I’m well within my right. That’s the lawful argument which you should be fully aware of based on your previous statements. Also I’m 100% sure most people would choose their pets over a near stranger anyway, but believe what you like

>idk why you got upset and decided to get involved

Nice projection, keep coping kid :)

0