Submitted by Sariel007 t3_zebydk in UpliftingNews
MyAccountWasBanned7 t1_iz5t8q5 wrote
Now do the other 49!
This should have always been the case. The stigma around discussing and being transparent about wages (created entirely by predatory executives) needs to die.
Fishy1911 t1_iz5vd51 wrote
We've had this in Colorado for a few years. Some of the big tech companies exclude hiring remote here because of it.
forgot_to_growup t1_iz63gdc wrote
Which companies?
alnyland t1_iz64zmv wrote
I see this regularly, especially for remote - “remote available but not in Colorado”. It trends with the shittiness of the company, so I haven’t really bothered.
forgot_to_growup t1_iz72xr6 wrote
Interesting that shitty companies are opposed to transparency…….
TheRealMoofoo t1_iz73oc8 wrote
Maybe gonna be a little trickier with how large the tech presence in WA is.
forgot_to_growup t1_iz73vdq wrote
I was thinking the same thing. I live near Seattle and the tech presence is huge.
Fishy1911 t1_iz64ckh wrote
Great question. It was a few years ago, there were news articles about companies having the Colorado exception, when we first did this, so it shouldn't be hard to Google. I wasn't looking and I'm not in tech.
scdirtdragon t1_iz6hd4d wrote
California also starts new year, Colorado has had it a while, its coming state by state
alabasterwilliams t1_iz5wqoy wrote
In Minnesota, discussion of wages and earnings is not against labor laws, but your employer can stipulate no wage discussion while on the clock, which is where most employees get together.
It’s a fucked system, and if you ever shied away from the discussion of wages, you aren’t helping the situation.
DynamicHunter t1_iz6c6jo wrote
That sounds like it’s against federal labor law which supersedes state law
alabasterwilliams t1_iz792g6 wrote
It’s messy, but the languages allows wiggle room in an at will employment state.
I’m busy now, but the federal labor department spells it out pretty clearly.
scyber t1_iz6ny6g wrote
New York has this now. I had forgotten about it till I looked at some jobs my company recently posted
Festernd t1_iz72zuu wrote
*city
It's not the entire state, just something like 50% of the population :)
RealFrog t1_iz7hdyy wrote
The ranges must be "good faith", which is a laugher. Citigroup posted some jobs with a range of $0 to $2,000,000 -- then blamed a "computer glitch". Suuuuuuure it was.
KittenKoder t1_iz77cuk wrote
As much as I wish we were, we're not the first to do this. ;)
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments