Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Fishy1911 t1_iz5vd51 wrote

We've had this in Colorado for a few years. Some of the big tech companies exclude hiring remote here because of it.

46

forgot_to_growup t1_iz63gdc wrote

Which companies?

3

alnyland t1_iz64zmv wrote

I see this regularly, especially for remote - “remote available but not in Colorado”. It trends with the shittiness of the company, so I haven’t really bothered.

37

forgot_to_growup t1_iz72xr6 wrote

Interesting that shitty companies are opposed to transparency…….

9

TheRealMoofoo t1_iz73oc8 wrote

Maybe gonna be a little trickier with how large the tech presence in WA is.

5

forgot_to_growup t1_iz73vdq wrote

I was thinking the same thing. I live near Seattle and the tech presence is huge.

3

Fishy1911 t1_iz64ckh wrote

Great question. It was a few years ago, there were news articles about companies having the Colorado exception, when we first did this, so it shouldn't be hard to Google. I wasn't looking and I'm not in tech.

3