Picolete t1_j5ys1ey wrote
Reply to comment by PerepeL in Researchers unveil the least costly carbon capture system to date - down to $39 per metric ton. by heavy-metal-goth-gal
I would remove that /s, if you read the article, it's one of it uses
PerepeL t1_j5ysgvg wrote
That's even funnier, I read it afterwards. There is no way they are getting ton of methanol for around 100 bucks, so it's BS anyways.
Picolete t1_j5yt3qf wrote
And probably when you use methanol you re release carbon
PerepeL t1_j5ytnvz wrote
Yeah, that's the reason for /s in original comment. I just couldn't imagine such level of bullshitting :)
sluttyjamjams73 t1_j5yw71p wrote
Methanol sourced in this way would represent carbon already in the cycle. That's very different than adding excess carbon to the system.
boersc t1_j5z03oo wrote
ANY methanol is already stored somewhere. Some in the form of crude oil underground.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments