Submitted by JGfromtheNW t3_102hbnq in Washington
neuracnu t1_j2tntf6 wrote
“…one suspect told authorities they did it so they could break into a business and steal money, U.S. authorities said Tuesday.”
I’m all for using the correct names for things. If this was truly the intent, I think the crime is Criminal Sabotage.
That said, intent is often difficult to definitively prove.
Jan 19 2023 update: So it sounds like these two had been under surveillance by the FBI by domestic terrorism specialists in 2021-2022. That changes things. https://www.reuters.com/world/us/two-men-arrested-attacks-washington-state-power-substations-2023-01-03/
mochamittens t1_j2toror wrote
That story would also be a good way to get lesser charges.
Lch207560 t1_j2tr5bz wrote
I don't know if it is a 'good' way but from the sound of it it's their only way to get lesser charges
Maleficent_1213 t1_j2tr8lb wrote
it's also the plot of a tv show...can't remember which one cause it's been a while.
SereneDreams03 t1_j2ts7ju wrote
This was the plot of the Brooklyn Nine-Nine episode Lights Out
Maleficent_1213 t1_j2tt6li wrote
ok, then it's the plot of multiple tv shows then 😂
NathanArizona t1_j2torta wrote
I’d bet with multiple power station attacks it will be fairly easy to prove something beyond conspiracy to burglarize. Dumbasses probably thought they had an airtight story in case they were caught
priority_inversion t1_j2uslm3 wrote
I'm guessing they are saying that to avoid domestic terrorism charges.
Extension-Stable-487 t1_j2x8w4q wrote
There is no domestic terrorism charge
BaseballGuy2001 t1_j2vpleb wrote
Agreed!
shitwheresmyjuul t1_j2yg8ov wrote
Risk 30 years to get some cash worth 10 years, probably out on probation in less than a year.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments