Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

AdUnfair1643 t1_j2t8zvk wrote

Huh, and they’re from Puyallup and have links to white supremacist groups? Shocking.

38

Jetlaggedz8 t1_j2ta5v3 wrote

Where does it say that?

"According to the complaint, Greenwood told investigators after his arrest that the two knocked out power so they could burglarize a business and steal from the cash register. The business was not identified in the complaint."

The motive appears to be burglary.

3

Theotar t1_j2ta6qs wrote

Attacking 4 different power stations does not add up for stealing register money.

74

boing757 t1_j2tane5 wrote

Can't wait for the network talking heads pronounce 'Puyallup'.

173

Seraphynas t1_j2tcscl wrote

The article also said:

> the first and fourth attacks were separated by over twelve hours

Seems they had plenty of time to go burglarize, but instead came back to attack another power station.

26

AdUnfair1643 t1_j2tcyss wrote

Lol you fucking ass clown, I didn’t say they did it because they’re neo nazis.

They did it AND they’re linked to white supremacy groups while being from Puyallup.

You’re quick fucking jump to that conclusion arent you

−16

foundnotes t1_j2tf6dg wrote

Its not vandalism, its domestic terrorism.

90

reroboto t1_j2tnpgn wrote

“The two men were known to authorities, and had been under FBI surveillance for more than a month in late 2021 and early 2022, FBI special agent Mark Tucher said in an affidavit filed in federal court on Tuesday. The agent did not give reasons for that surveillance, but Tucher described himself in the affidavit as an expert in domestic terrorism assigned to the FBI Seattle division's joint terrorism task force.” From Reuters

154

neuracnu t1_j2tntf6 wrote

“…one suspect told authorities they did it so they could break into a business and steal money, U.S. authorities said Tuesday.”

I’m all for using the correct names for things. If this was truly the intent, I think the crime is Criminal Sabotage.

That said, intent is often difficult to definitively prove.

Jan 19 2023 update: So it sounds like these two had been under surveillance by the FBI by domestic terrorism specialists in 2021-2022. That changes things. https://www.reuters.com/world/us/two-men-arrested-attacks-washington-state-power-substations-2023-01-03/

31

NathanArizona t1_j2torta wrote

I’d bet with multiple power station attacks it will be fairly easy to prove something beyond conspiracy to burglarize. Dumbasses probably thought they had an airtight story in case they were caught

28

Seraphynas t1_j2tv2f6 wrote

The first 3 attacks happened in a cluster on Christmas morning.

Then the 4th and final attack happened much later that evening.

So they waited all day and then went and attacked another power station?

13

suavaleesko t1_j2u24d3 wrote

So they can get a warrant for unknown persons whose phones accessed 4 specific towers?

−3

captianbob t1_j2u9mao wrote

So they watched them commit the crime, them let them go home, then arrested them? Is that what you're saying?

I'm saying, if they're were under surveillance from someone that deals with terrorism and thet were still able to commit this from... Then what help was the surveillance?

Edit: nevermind I read it as they were still under surveillance. My bad.

−4

AdUnfair1643 t1_j2uam6s wrote

Go to their Facebook pages and see they have affiliation with whites supremacist groups. You can read, their names are on the second paragraph. Thanks for demonstrating that you’re incapable of not being a cunt.

1

KevinCarbonara t1_j2uee2s wrote

> You can't arrest someone for a crime they haven't committed.

Well... yes, you can. That's why there are charges for things like "attempted murder" or "criminal conspiracy". I don't know why you think it's impossible to criminalize planning crimes, but we already have done precisely that.

6

suavaleesko t1_j2uf8db wrote

Not the fact that they were able to no. I'm just interested in the aspect of whether they had a suspect first then got a warrant for their phones, or if they started with a blanket search of the towers and worked off that list.

5

Pwillyams1 t1_j2uje0i wrote

That would be interesting for sure. I can't imagine the sophistication of someone doing all this with their phones by their side the whole time. Clearly no super criminals....fortunately.

4

Dr-Satan-PhD t1_j2vdivq wrote

>According to the complaint, Greenwood told investigators after his arrest that the two knocked out power so they could burglarize a business and steal from the cash register. The business was not identified in the complaint.

Bullshit. You don't take out 4 power substations so you can burglarize a single business. There's way more to this than some fucking burglary.

4

barefootozark t1_j2vjzvp wrote

But that is exactly what they did.

> “While the power was out, after the Graham and South Hill attacks, the two went to a local business, Crahan drilled out a lock, and Greenwood entered to steal from the cash register,” agents wrote in charging documents filed Tuesday in the Western Washington U.S. District Court.

But these low level criminals were also known by the FBI for some time.

These geniuses also carried their cell phone during the crimes to make it easier for the FBI to ID them. Where did idiots like this get the idea that cutting power to substations would be a good idea?

E-isac had warning for December 23rd, so the feds were expecting it. Who showed these two how to known out substations.

3

Faroutman1234 t1_j2vloon wrote

Pierce county is rife with “youallquaida”

−1

Pwillyams1 t1_j2w74y8 wrote

Those thoughts are probably why you are committing federal weapons violations that will put you in prison for at least a decade too. I don't know what was going on in their minds, if anything, and I don't want to know.

1

hitbycars t1_j2xajw7 wrote

There are photos from one of the stations of the two men. If they check pings and find profiles (these guys were under watch so the fed knows what they look like) for guys who look like those two men then that seems pretty straight forward.

2

smegdawg t1_j2xy7j2 wrote

>FBI special agent Mark Tucher... Tucher described himself in the affidavit as an expert in domestic terrorism assigned to the FBI Seattle division's joint terrorism task force.

3

VinkiVinks t1_j2ywyx3 wrote

I see what you're saying now. It's not a specific charge bc domestic terrorism is to broad of a term and can umbrella several different crimes but it's still a type of crime that can be investigated for more specific charges.

They attacked a grid which is seen as domestic terrorism as it affects thousands of people. So since it's not an actual charge we are free to just call them domestic terrorists. Lol

2

Extension-Stable-487 t1_j2z7ep4 wrote

It's not pedantry, there's just no domestic terrorism charge. It's like if someone claimed there's a charge for murder in the 147th degree. Pointing out that no such thing exists and it's not a criminal charge is not pedantic.

2

De_Roche22 t1_j2z8jov wrote

Nah, it's pretty goddamn pedantic.

Existence of a domestic terrorism charge or not, they're still catching federal charges for damaging four separate power substations, alleged in some weird plan to rob a business's cash register.

The point is there are way easier methods for robbing a cash register that don't involve a FBI investigation and federal charges.

0

Extension-Stable-487 t1_j2z94ln wrote

>Nah, it's pretty goddamn pedantic.

The conversation is "they're going to be charged with domestic terrorism," "no they won't, that's not a charge," "you're being pedantic." Frankly, it's pretty clear you don't know what "pedantic" means lol.

>Existence of a domestic terrorism charge or not, they're still catching federal charges for damaging four separate power substations, alleged in some weird plan to rob a business's cash register.

Yes? That has nothing to do with what I said. Idk what you think you're doing here.

>The point is there are way easier methods for robbing a cash register that don't involve a FBI investigation and federal charges.

Ok? Like yeah that's true, it's just irrelevant here. Some people are misinformed and think domestic terrorism is a criminal charge. Pointing out the fact of the matter is all I was doing. Nothing to get your panties in a twist about.

1

cheekabowwow t1_j31coxm wrote

Smoke and mirrors. People in here are bad about making wild claims and not following up. The original story had dozens of people blaming right-wing groups. It reeked of bot manipulation and conspiracy theories.

1