Submitted by z00ker t3_104ztx0 in Washington
pala4833 t1_j37yp2y wrote
Reply to comment by z00ker in Traveling from SeaTac to Forks by z00ker
> Forks looks more interesting
It's not. Neither is PA.
pretty-apricot07 t1_j387rhp wrote
Maybe they're into Twilight?
pala4833 t1_j38drud wrote
Doesn't change what I said any.
z00ker OP t1_j381ic6 wrote
I'd say the variety of a new place could hold my attention for a day. Almost anywhere can be more exciting than where you are.
AlarmingAttention151 t1_j388orw wrote
PA has a little more than Forks at least, and I spent a nice afternoon in a bookstore and outdoor shop there, plus the waterfront. Trust us when we say there’s truly nothing in Forks. I planned to spend a morning there on a road trip this summer, but ended up continuing on after about 45 minutes. Shi Shi and the coast are gorgeous, enjoy!!
pala4833 t1_j3851ht wrote
You'll see what I mean when you're here.
lostprevention t1_j3895dy wrote
Port Angeles has a pier, and Ediz Hook is often overlooked. Fun way to spend a couple hours scanning for orcas.
[deleted] t1_j39zv0m wrote
[deleted]
Knightoforder42 t1_j384fry wrote
That's very optimistic, considering there's not a days worth of stuff to do there, unless you really like the very small logging museum and general store.
Regardless, I hope you have a great trip.
[deleted] t1_j389agf wrote
Odd take. If OPs purpose is to be in the forest and near the ocean, then there’s unlimited things to do in Forks. Just walk around.
cautionturtle t1_j39kq2w wrote
Don't underestimate Port Angeles... it's closer to the park and to prettier parts of the coast. I would underestimate Forks if I were you. Port Angeles has way more variety if that's really what you're looking for.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments