Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

spitfish t1_jbl5wgs wrote

Reply to comment by [deleted] in Jim McGovern in the news by jpm01609

They invaded the capitol in the hopes of preventing the transfer of power after Benedict Cheetos lost the election. It was quite clear what happened. The only ones saying otherwise are FOX and their ilk attempting to muddy the waters. But I appreciate the racist attempt to draw BLM into the conversation.

2

[deleted] t1_jblelqj wrote

Racist? Lemme guess. Nazi, homophobe, anti trans, boot locker, brown shirt, kkk, anti climate, fascist…. Did I miss anything?

So you see no hypocrisy is calling a completely unarmed riot an “insurrection” but killing, looting, robbing and burning gov and private buis is mostly peaceful? Of course you don’t because you’ve picked your side.

So mass protests and the freedom to assemble is an invasion? Was it an invasion during the woman’s march? Million man march? Biker rally? Or is it “invasion” when you don’t agree with it? Such a violent invasion that resulted in one death, no occupying, no guns, no bombs, no fires… but definitely “invasion”. Spare me.

1st amendment applies to everyone just as long as you agree with it right?

−4

spitfish t1_jblj7ir wrote

I go by the research. Black Lives Matter protests were mostly peaceful. There was nothing about January 6th that was intended to be peaceful, starting with the rally beforehand. Remember, plenty of GOP politicians were frantic as the events unfolded.

I look forward to the DOJ's, & the special counsel's, continued investigation into it. They are already over 300 convictions.

3

[deleted] t1_jbskgvs wrote

[deleted]

1