Submitted by moisheah t3_xssb6m in WorcesterMA

Three fines totaling $300 have been issued to the general contractor after the fire at the under-construction Doherty Memorial High School.

The Sept. 12 blaze sent flames and smoke high into the air, piquing the curiosity of city residents and beyond.

The cause of the fire was determined to be a “welding incident,” which ignited piled roofing material, according to Acting Fire Deputy Chief Adam J. Roche.

At the time of the fire, the required “hot work permit” from the Fire Department had lapsed, Roche said.

Roche confirmed Thursday that Fontaine Bros. Inc of Springfield was cited for performing hot work in non-designated locations without a hot work permit; failure of the hot work operator to handle equipment so as to not endanger lives and property; and failure to comply with requirements relating to the safeguarding of structures undergoing construction, alteration or demolition.

Three fines

Each fine is $100.

Roche said proper permits have been issued since the fire.

The permits are issued to the individual companies once they submit the location of work on the site and scope of work on the site, Roche said.

Acting Deputy Chief Adam J. Roche, center, at the fire scene Sept. 12. If either of those changes, the company is required to apply for a new permit, according to Roche.

In most instances, but at the discretion of the department, a fire-watch will be required, Roche said.

School officials have said the fire did not impact the construction schedule. The school is due to be finished in two years.

A message left with Fontaine Bros. was not immediately returned.

32

Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

poopydeeznuts t1_iqlzq84 wrote

It’s only a $100 fine to weld without a hot works permit? No wonder every contractor basically ignores them lol.

41

boba79 t1_iqmarc9 wrote

City probably spent $10,000 in manpower, fuel, and material wear responding.

22

aKaake t1_iqm2it7 wrote

Now who gets to pay for all the damage to the new school?

WTF is actually going on? The Mill St apartment fucktard landlords are trying to sue the tenants, after leaving them all homeless, and now this?

Is no one held responsible for their actions anymore?

21

AWalker17 t1_iqmfdal wrote

Can you expand on the Mill St. fire? They’re trying to sue the tenants? For what?

2

DoubtfulThomas t1_iqml5ei wrote

Just search “Mill” on this sub and you’ll see a week by week breakdown lol

https://www.reddit.com/r/WorcesterMA/comments/w8gb47/owner_of_mill_st_apartment_that_had_roof_collapse/

1

AWalker17 t1_iqmmd3y wrote

Thanks. That doesn’t sound like a lawsuit?

2

DoubtfulThomas t1_iqmna5g wrote

Proactively taking all your tenants to housing court to escape liability because of contractor negligence

−1

AWalker17 t1_iqmopa8 wrote

I’m not saying it’s right. I’m saying it’s not a lawsuit.

> At a hearing in housing court, the owners' attorney asked the judge to issue an order giving them permission to remove the tenants' belongings, put some into storage and dispose of any that might be damaged by water or mold.

8

NovelNo87 t1_iqmnji3 wrote

That’ll teach him.

4

Dharuacharya t1_iqmplbl wrote

My late library fee is more than that!

4

Cheesepit t1_iqmvhua wrote

You don't have to pay late fees anymore at the worcester public library

2