Yeah - that seems to be a fair analysis.

From her talking points, she doesn't womp you over the head with the anti-vaccination thing, but tries to carefully soften the language to diffuse it a bit.

Somebody had posted this from her Ballotpedia responses :

"Our public health agencies have been narrowly focused on infectious disease and the pharmaceutical model. A broader approach that includes supporting true health will benefit both the physical and mental health crises, reduce costs, improve productivity, and make us more resilient in the face of another pandemic. It also improves quality of life. Public health should be supportive, not coercive. Medical mandates erode trust in our public health institutions, create worker shortages, financially hurt hard-working families, and have negative physical and psychological impacts."