Submitted by legalpretzel t3_yqiagr in WorcesterMA
teddygrahamdispenser t1_ivolkqm wrote
Reply to comment by Karen1968a in Good job Worcester! We passed the CPA! by legalpretzel
If the $5/month or whatever it ends up being for most landlords significantly impacts rents then I think it'll be pretty clear who is to blame.
Karen1968a t1_ivos6sx wrote
Yep. The people who voted for it.
Lr0dy t1_iwbxydu wrote
No. The landlords who raised the rent. Note that they said significantly. If rent goes up by $3-5 a month, that's not significant.
Karen1968a t1_iwc6gru wrote
Perhaps
Lr0dy t1_iwc6rbh wrote
Perhaps what? You seem to lack a clear understanding of cause and effect - if someone is using one thing as an excuse to do another thing, then the cause is not the first thing existing, but the person choosing to find an excuse for the second thing.
Karen1968a t1_iwc9ibv wrote
Itβs over. Iβve lost interest. Im always going to be anti tax. I lost π€·ββοΈ
Lr0dy t1_iwcawsm wrote
Then you're anti-society. Please feel free to leave at your earliest convenience, and we ask that you cease and desist in any and all usage of services which taxes provide, like roads.
Karen1968a t1_iwcbx39 wrote
Please feel free to kiss my rich conservative white butt π
Lr0dy t1_iwcfk11 wrote
Ew. I think of nothing more unappealing than rich white conservatives.
Karen1968a t1_iwcox4d wrote
Well in my opinion lazy liberals looking for handouts are worse. But, just an opinion π
Lr0dy t1_iwdevlu wrote
Luckily, you still only get one vote, and I'm happy to say that I nullify it.
Karen1968a t1_iwdf2gx wrote
Yep. And vice versa π
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments