[deleted] t1_j1nlyxz wrote
Honest-Cauliflower64 t1_j1o3jzl wrote
Even if they didn’t, he can read the minds of anyone observing the match and use their ideas for moves. A bunch of other chess players watching this match? They’re thinking about all the possible moves, and he can just latch onto that EZ.
Even if he doesn’t win, he’ll have managed to keep his reputation as someone who can play chess at all.
shingofan t1_j1o65g8 wrote
Also, you would think that they've picked up on at least the rules and some basic strategies from the constant mind reading
DarthStrakh t1_j1o72vj wrote
Right? Just because you know their move doesn't mean you know how to counter it. You'd still have to know actual chess
PresNixon t1_j1nwce2 wrote
You’re a mind reader, not a Game Genie.
AdamByLucius t1_j1nuhja wrote
Mind reading won’t work on a bot. That’s just science.
relefos t1_j1o1714 wrote
The true “gotcha” for this prompt is that a toddler could beat a 100 elo bot. I think if I let my cat walk on a chess board and translated those moves to the game against the bot, the cat would still win
TidalShadow1 t1_j1p1a8c wrote
Honestly, probably better than even odds that random moves beat a 100 rating
Drachefly t1_j1q9z4y wrote
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DpXy041BIlA
(note, though, that this is not the same elo scale as human participants, but it does show that it takes work to get down to 100)
[deleted] t1_j1opl4v wrote
[deleted]
helmsmagus t1_j1pbk32 wrote
The fact that a complicated series of if statements isn't a brain.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments